• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:222]World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

But apparently the time for you to humiliate yourself (this applies to your buddies Tim and Kevin as well) will never end. Keep it up, Jack. You provide so much fun for we who actually read and understand the science.

Is this your way of compensating for your inability to respond to #104?
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

At one time the air in the LA basin was clear. Guess what, it got smoggy. “Man” made some changes and guess what, it’s cleaner.

Smog is a modern name but, it was in the LA basin long before modern man invented the term. The native Indians of the region referred to the basin as the "valley of smokes". Now what does that have to do with melting glaciers?
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

I thought it would be interesting to see what the IPCC report actually said instead of the subjective graph.
From page 1180,

Now if we consider that RCP8.5 is not possible because it is not sustainable

Where does it say "unsustainable" in the report so how did you decide to use that term? What does "unsustainable" mean scientifically, in the first place as it's certainly not a word in the scientific vocabulary? Quoting a part of one of these reports and then adding your personal spin pretty much destroys any chance you had of making a point. FAIL.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Is this your way of compensating for your inability to respond to #104?

Why, no, Jack. It was my way of smacking your and the others' fails at trying to debunk science. You're all really comically bad at this.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Where does it say "unsustainable" in the report so how did you decide to use that term? What does "unsustainable" mean scientifically, in the first place as it's certainly not a word in the scientific vocabulary? Quoting a part of one of these reports and then adding your personal spin pretty much destroys any chance you had of making a point. FAIL.
Please consider the physical requirements to achieve an energy imbalance of 8.5 Wm-2 by year 2100.
RCP8.5 requires that by year 2100, CO2 levels will be 1370 ppm, this is up from the current 410 ppm, by 960 ppm.
The change is supposed to happen in the next 81 years, and so would require an average rate of increase of
960/81= 11.85 ppm per year.
For the past two decades CO2 growth has averaged between 2 and 3 ppm per year.
ESRL Global Monitoring Division - Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network
This rate is based on an nearly unrestricted quest to find, refine, and burn every hydrocarbon possible.
To increase the growth rate, to the rate required by RCP8.5, would require increasing our mining, refining and transport capability
by nearly a factor of 4, which would require nearly four times the demand.
This would all have to happen without any major improvements in energy efficiency.
NO, RCP8.5 was meant as a limit for the equation, not a realistic scenario.
If we increased our discovery, transport and refining capability by a factor of 4, reserves would quickly deplete.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

At one time 2/3 of North America was covered with glaciers two miles thick. Guess what, they melted without any influence from man.

Guess what else--completely and stupidly irrelevant.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Its the same width relative to everything else in the picture. Its the picture, scaled down. Get a ruler.

Oh, fer****sakes, Kevin.....you leave me no other alternative to prove definitively how deliberately clueless, wrong and dishonest your are. First, I'll give you the NYPost's (a Murdoch paper) article about it:
NASA images show world’s thickest mountain glacier melting

But if you don't take a Newscorp paper's word for it here's the abstract of the original article:

Abstract: The Juneau Icefield Research Program (JIRP) has been examining the glaciers of the Juneau Icefield since 1946. The height of the transient snowline (TSL) at the end of the summer represents the annual equilibrium line altitude (ELA) for the glacier, where ablation equals accumulation. On Taku Glacier the ELA has been observed annually from 1946 to 2018. Since 1998 multiple annual observations of the TSL in satellite imagery identify both the migration rate of the TSL and ELA. The mean ELA has risen 85 ± 10 m from the 1946–1985 period to the 1986–2018 period. In 2018 the TSL was observed at: 900 m on 5 July; 975 m on 21 July; 1075 m on 30 July; 1400 m on 16 September; and 1425 m on 1 October. This is the first time since 1946 that the TSL has reached or exceeded 1250 m on Taku Glacier. The 500 m TSL rise from 5 July to 30 July, 8.0. md−1, is the fastest rate of rise observed. This combined with the observed balance gradient in this region yields an ablation rate of 40–43 mmd−1, nearly double the average ablation rate. On 22 July a snow pit was completed at 1405 m with 0.93 m w.e. (water equivalent), that subsequently lost all snow cover, prior to 16 September. This is one of eight snow pits completed in July providing field data to verify the ablation rate. The result of the record ELA and rapid ablation is the largest negative annual balance of Taku Glacier since records began in 1946.

Finally, a link to the entire article which I'm sure you're eager to read and educate yourself (cue laugh track):
Remote Sensing | Free Full-Text | Exceptionally High 2018 Equilibrium Line Altitude on Taku Glacier, Alaska | HTML
May I say how much I've enjoyed our exchanges, Kevin. It's always fun to get one of you science deniers on the record for so many false and ignorant comments and then smack them all down.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Obvious, you!

Just to save time, I'll refer you to comment #133 below to Kevin as it well applies to you, Jack, Tim and all the science ignorant and science denying claque that always shows up when these facts are presented.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Oh, fer****sakes, Kevin.....you leave me no other alternative to prove definitively how deliberately clueless, wrong and dishonest your are. First, I'll give you the NYPost's (a Murdoch paper) article about it:
NASA images show world’s thickest mountain glacier melting

But if you don't take a Newscorp paper's word for it here's the abstract of the original article:



Finally, a link to the entire article which I'm sure you're eager to read and educate yourself (cue laugh track):
Remote Sensing | Free Full-Text | Exceptionally High 2018 Equilibrium Line Altitude on Taku Glacier, Alaska | HTML
May I say how much I've enjoyed our exchanges, Kevin. It's always fun to get one of you science deniers on the record for so many false and ignorant comments and then smack them all down.

I don't dispute the contents of any of that.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

I don't dispute the contents of any of that.

But, I'm betting you're still--in the face of all the facts about that glacier's shrinkage--going to stick to the lie that the pictures were doctored or just show the same glacier in reduced size even though those are the photos used in the Post's article which came from the original report. I'd like to lose that bet but I doubt I will.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Why, no, Jack. It was my way of smacking your and the others' fails at trying to debunk science. You're all really comically bad at this.

You remain afraid to discuss the substance of the debate. With each vapid, content free post, you reinforce my point.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

You remain afraid to discuss the substance of the debate. With each vapid, content free post, you reinforce my point.

Once again you get stung by the science and lash out with just more bull****.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Nope. So long as my #104 remains unanswered, the ball is in your court.

Well, you asked for it. It's the same answer all of your science denying BS gets----it's science denying bull****. This Kenneth Richard* is a frequent source of this BS in the climate denying BS community. This deflection to this moronic idea that local sea level changes disproves the fact that it's rising globally or is no consequence is stupidty writ large and bold. But you fall for it every time because your ideology refuses to allow any fact in.

*here's his bslog (i.e. bull****blog) which shows just what a nutcase, lying freak he is and I'm sure he's a motherlode for your purposes:
http://https://notrickszone.com/author/kenneth-richard/
 
Last edited:
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Just to save time, I'll refer you to comment #133 below to Kevin as it well applies to you, Jack, Tim and all the science ignorant and science denying claque that always shows up when these facts are presented.

I refer you back to your post #131. Your post had no bearing on my original comment that was a fact that points out there is nothing new here, another fact is that your reply to that was what was "completely and stupidly irrelevant". Judging from your posts it seems your main purpose here is to doggedly attack anyone who does not adhere to your views.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Well, you asked for it. It's the same answer all of your science denying BS gets----it's science denying bull****. This Kenneth Richard* is a frequent source of this BS in the climate denying BS community. This deflection to this moronic idea that local sea level changes disproves the fact that it's rising globally or is no consequence is stupidty writ large and bold. But you fall for it every time because your ideology refuses to allow any fact in.

*here's his bslog (i.e. bull****blog) which shows just what a nutcase, lying freak he is and I'm sure he's a motherlode for your purposes:
http://https://notrickszone.com/author/kenneth-richard/

Your insults are no substitute for science, and I note you are still dodging #104. Your nastiness is a sign of weakness. Here's more you to dodge.

[h=2]Climate Alarmism Dies In 2018 As Modern Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise Has No Net Impact On World’s Coasts[/h]By Kenneth Richard on 15. November 2018
The year 2018 could mark the beginning of the end of climate change alarmist reporting. Projections of catastrophic melting of the ice sheets and sea level rise swallowing up the Earth’s coasts are increasingly undermined by observations. Extensive glacier and ice sheet melt resulting in an accelerated sea level rise threatening the world’s population centers […]
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Well, you asked for it. It's the same answer all of your science denying BS gets----it's science denying bull****. This Kenneth Richard* is a frequent source of this BS in the climate denying BS community. This deflection to this moronic idea that local sea level changes disproves the fact that it's rising globally or is no consequence is stupidty writ large and bold. But you fall for it every time because your ideology refuses to allow any fact in.

*here's his bslog (i.e. bull****blog) which shows just what a nutcase, lying freak he is and I'm sure he's a motherlode for your purposes:
http://https://notrickszone.com/author/kenneth-richard/

[h=2]Sea Level Rise Rate Along Coast So Far Only About One Seventh Of IPCC Alarmist Projections![/h]By P Gosselin on 19. July 2018
The time in running out for the purveyors of the “rapidly accelerating sea level rise” scare story. Especially IPCC alarmist scientists like spreading scare stories about sea level rise, and how it’s accelerating. So far global CO2 emissions have in fact continued to climb at a rate that is defined as the “business as usual” emissions […]
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Well, you asked for it. It's the same answer all of your science denying BS gets----it's science denying bull****. This Kenneth Richard* is a frequent source of this BS in the climate denying BS community. This deflection to this moronic idea that local sea level changes disproves the fact that it's rising globally or is no consequence is stupidty writ large and bold. But you fall for it every time because your ideology refuses to allow any fact in.

*here's his bslog (i.e. bull****blog) which shows just what a nutcase, lying freak he is and I'm sure he's a motherlode for your purposes:
http://https://notrickszone.com/author/kenneth-richard/

[h=2]New Research Finds Sea Level Rise Claims “Definitely Conjecture”…”Highly Erroneous”…Coastlines Stable Or Growing![/h]By P Gosselin on 11. July 2018
Accelerating sea level rise due to global warming is supposed to eat away at the shorelines across the globe. However a recent paper published in the journal Nature here authored by a team scientists led by Arjen Luijendijk found that some 75% of the world’s sandy shorelines are stable or growing! An analysis of satellite-derived shoreline […]
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Well, you asked for it. It's the same answer all of your science denying BS gets----it's science denying bull****. This Kenneth Richard* is a frequent source of this BS in the climate denying BS community. This deflection to this moronic idea that local sea level changes disproves the fact that it's rising globally or is no consequence is stupidty writ large and bold. But you fall for it every time because your ideology refuses to allow any fact in.

*here's his bslog (i.e. bull****blog) which shows just what a nutcase, lying freak he is and I'm sure he's a motherlode for your purposes:
http://https://notrickszone.com/author/kenneth-richard/

[h=2]Bewildered Scientists…A Global Warming Crisis Fails To Appear: Sea Level Rise Grinds To A Crawl[/h]By P Gosselin on 2. February 2018
Over the past months a spate of scientific papers published show sea level rise has not accelerated like many climate warming scientists warned earlier. The reality is that the rise is far slower than expected, read here and here. Alarmist bedwetting by scientists over sea level rise proving to have been needless. Photo: PIK climate […]
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Judging from your posts it seems your main purpose here is to doggedly attack anyone who does not adhere to your views.

No, it's to doggedly point out the stupidity of trying to compare an event that came and went over a 2.6 million year period to a change in climate that has happened in less than 150 years.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

[h=2]Bewildered Scientists…A Global Warming Crisis Fails To Appear: Sea Level Rise Grinds To A Crawl[/h]By P Gosselin on 2. February 2018
Over the past months a spate of scientific papers published show sea level rise has not accelerated like many climate warming scientists warned earlier. The reality is that the rise is far slower than expected, read here and here. Alarmist bedwetting by scientists over sea level rise proving to have been needless. Photo: PIK climate […]

Just continuing to cite bogus science from fake scientists writing on rightwing science-denying political blogs just makes you more ridiculous that you already are, Jack, and that's more than fine with me. Saves me time and energy.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Jack, you're in nervous breakdown territory here. Get a grip.
 
Re: World's Thickest Mountain Glacier Is Finally Melting,

Just continuing to cite bogus science from fake scientists writing on rightwing science-denying political blogs just makes you more ridiculous that you already are, Jack, and that's more than fine with me. Saves me time and energy.

The post cites (and links) four peer-reviewed papers. Stop deflecting.
 
Back
Top Bottom