Re: Bazant Misconduct website is launched
Intentional ignorance of the signs of structural instability.
Why did the building show instability hours before the imaginary CD?
It didn't. The building rocked 90 seconds and 6 seconds before the East Penthouse. Audible percussive noises occurred at least 3 seconds before the East Penthouse fell.
Intentional ignorance of when the Penthouse fell.
Maybe the psychic engineer had something to do with it. Otherwise, that question can be answered by a serious investigation.
Ignorant answer to serious question.
Who did the pre-CD preparation of the columns for your imaginary CD? (CLUE: NO PREP = MASSIVE INCREASE IN EXPLOSIVES NEEDED)
Not an answer.
Who planted the explosives for your imaginary CD?
The OEM renovations in 1998-1999 is a logical place to look first.
Now this REALLY shows the ignorance in explosives and buildings.
Renovations long before 9/11 are when the explosives were planted. Completely ignoring the fact there is maintenance and renovations going on constantly. Building inspections, etc. Plus the threat of fire or other disaster. Plumbing issues, refurbishing work spaces, etc.
That is stupid on a whole new level.
How many people within maintenance actually see the naked steel columns? They don't. Also, it's called an "inside job" for a reason.
How many people see the columns? Potential for plenty. Ah, now the maintenance staff are "in on it"
Why didn't any of the maintenance or facilities personnel find these imaginary explosives?
That was answered for you here and I'm sure many times before.
Post number?
How did the imaginary explosives survive the fires?
Demolitions don't always produce seismic spikes like that.
"
But with the charges positioned above ground instead of within the crust -- where the release of strain results in powerful earthquakes -- the Aladdin implosion didn't even register on the nearby seismograph at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, according to geology professor Dave Weide."
LAS VEGAS RJ:NEWS: If The Big One Hits Here, Will We Be Ready?
Yet you require far more explosives to do the job. Remember the explosives were planted years ago without prepping the building.
Why no telltale seismic
or audible signatures when the imaginary explosives went off?
Audio evidence for explosions in WTC 7 has already been pointed out to you.
And laughed at.
Explosions not consistent with CD are not evidence of explosives...
Remember, your unprepared building will require far more explosives than a normal CD.
That was answered for you here and I'm sure many times before.
Post number?
When no shattering of windows around the WTC7?
Not an answer.
Why are the windows in WTC7 intact after the imaginary explosives went off?
You don't understand the term?
Proof of ignorance when dealing with explosives.
1. Det cord is not needed, wireless methods have been available for years
2. Det cord comes in a variety of colors and could be indistinguishable from ordinary cords found in buildings.
Wireless is fine over open air... Remember your explosives are hid deep in a building. Not ideal by ANY stretch of the imagination... Not only that... Radio fired explosives were planted years ago? And left armed?
And now det cord looks like other cords. According you...
Not in the real world.
1. They could've all exploded successfully
Not with your fantasy wireless detonators....
Why no unexpended explosives found?
2. Who says there wasn't? Large volumes of WTC rubble was almost quite literally stolen from the fresh kills landfill, including a lot from Building 7.
https://oig.justice.gov/special/0403a/index.htm
So folks went in and stole the fantasy explosives.... Is that your story now?
Too big of a can of worms. Either way, I gave you evidence that enough suspicious residues were found to warrant an investigation into insider foul play in the WTC destruction.
What "suspicious residues"? Post number?
And there were investigations. And they actually know who was involved in the foul play....
You just refuse to accept it.