• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Flynn’s Name Never ‘Masked’ in Call Transcripts Briefed to Obama, Records Indicate

Your guy is firing Inspector Generals. Why should we believe the right wing?

As he should, he should have fired them all on Jan 21, 2017, every single Obama and Bush lackey! This became a problem for Trump, perhaps due to his narc type personality ( he wanted them to like/ love him), big mistake.
 
As he should, he should have fired them all on Jan 21, 2017, every single Obama and Bush lackey! This became a problem for Trump, perhaps due to his narc type personality ( he wanted them to like/ love him), big mistake.

No, he should not. IG offices are non-partisan. Cronyism is not part of their job description.
 
Your guy has fired or is firing everyone around him who actually understands our Constitution and how our Government is supposed to work.
Huh? Certainly Trump and his staff understand the Constitution.

Should we take lessons from the Obama Administration on how the government is supposed to work?? Are governments they supposed to lie to the people?? That's ridiculous.
 
If you were to ask me that ten years ago, I'd answer "more left".

But I've found myself sliding slightly to the right over the these last few years.

IOW, you're a very confused person, easily led and with very poor judgment....well, we already could see that.
 
The Cult of Dirtbag needs to make up its "mind" (cue laughter). It used to be that you were outraged the he was unmasked and now you're outraged at the fact that he was never masked in the first place. I hope you people never tire of looking like idiots.
 
The Trump Administration is trying to destroy the Constitution? Who told you this?

We're watching it happen in front of our eyes. There's hardly a day goes by that Dirtbag doesn't claim some unconstitutional power. The most recent ones are tellung us he will not allow voting by mail in the next election despite all states having some form of absentee voting (done through the mails) and three have the entire process by mail (as well as in person if chosen). The other is claiming he can have Twitter shut down for calling his lies out---after using the platform for over a decade to spout them. The Cult of Dirtbag is all for it so, of course, you refuse to look at it. Admit it. You people are the cancer that's eating away at the foundations of this Republic.
 
We're watching it happen in front of our eyes. There's hardly a day goes by that Dirtbag doesn't claim some unconstitutional power. The most recent ones are tellung us he will not allow voting by mail in the next election despite all states having some form of absentee voting (done through the mails) and three have the entire process by mail (as well as in person if chosen). The other is claiming he can have Twitter shut down for calling his lies out---after using the platform for over a decade to spout them. The Cult of Dirtbag is all for it so, of course, you refuse to look at it. Admit it. You people are the cancer that's eating away at the foundations of this Republic.
Voting by mail is not mentioned in the Constitution and he has not threatened to shut don Twitter. Where do you get these idiocies? You should ask for your source to be shut down.
 
IOW, you're a very confused person, easily led and with very poor judgment....well, we already could see that.

If personal insults are all you have. Then you're simply a clear indicator of how the left's failings in both morality and integrity, are simply going to destroy them as a whole.

Have a nice day.
 
If personal insults are all you have. Then you're simply a clear indicator of how the left's failings in both morality and integrity, are simply going to destroy them as a whole.

Have a nice day.

Your Dear Dirtbag is an insult to and shame of this entire nation. It's always hilarious to read Dirtbag cultist spewing on about morality and integrity when they're humping for the most despicable glob of barely human crap on all counts.
 
Last edited:
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

50 U.S. Code § 1802.Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal; duties and compensation of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court

(1)Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney Genera, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
(A)the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i)the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii)the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B)there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C)the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.


50 U.S. Code § 1801.Definitions
...
(h)“Minimization procedures”, with respect to electronic surveillance, means—
(1)specific procedures, which shall be adopted by the Attorney General, that are reasonably designed in light of the purpose and technique of the particular surveillance, to minimize the acquisition and retention, and prohibit the dissemination, of nonpublicly available information concerning unconsenting United States persons consistent with the need of the United States to obtain, produce, and disseminate foreign intelligence information;
(2)procedures that require that nonpublicly available information, which is not foreign intelligence information, as defined in subsection (e)(1), shall not be disseminated in a manner that identifies any United States person, without such person’s consent, unless such person’s identity is necessary to understand foreign intelligence information or assess its importance;
(3)notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), procedures that allow for the retention and dissemination of information that is evidence of a crime which has been, is being, or is about to be committed and that is to be retained or disseminated for law enforcement purposes; and
(4)notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), with respect to any electronic surveillance approved pursuant to section 1802(a) of this title, procedures that require that no contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party shall be disclosed, disseminated, or used for any purpose or retained for longer than 72 hours unless a court order under section 1805 of this title is obtained or unless the Attorney General determines that the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.
(i)“United States person” means a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in section 1101(a)(20) of title 8), an unincorporated association a substantial number of members of which are citizens of the United States or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or a corporation which is incorporated in the United States, but does not include a corporation or an association which is a foreign power, as defined in subsection (a)(1), (2), or (3).

Fixed it for you. The red bolded are the only relevant parts of the law for why Flynn's identity wasn't masked.
 
Fixed it for you. The red bolded are the only relevant parts of the law for why Flynn's identity wasn't masked.

What's most relevant here is that the govt wiretapped the political opposition. That's something that only happens in undemocratic banana republics, not in first world democracies.
Surveilling the political opposition was why Nixon ordered the break-in at the Watergate hotel, and why he was forced to step down from office.

If you believe in surveilling the political opposition, then you're saying something about yourself.
And don't try to call yourself more patriotic than everyone else for doing so - that's exactly why it's said that "Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels"

Obama Whitehouse wanted to surveil the political opposition, like in a banana republic, and then wanted to pin a criminal charge on one of the opposition in order to retro-actively justify this after the fact.

"Found a horseshoe, now let's go get a horse to go with it" :roll:


If you find that what was done was acceptable, then you should be willing to accept it being done to you and to your party - then see how you like it.
 
Flynn’s Name Never ‘Masked’ in Call Transcripts Briefed to Obama, Records Indicate




Apparently, there is an exception allowed under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) which lets the President directly order the wiretap transcript through the Attorney General, who has to certify that this order is aimed at monitoring communications between foreign powers only, without substantial likelihood of catching a US citizen. Since this Presidentially-ordered wiretap transcript does not require masking of names of US citizens who get picked up, then the President & Attorney General have to ensure that the name of those US citizens don't get leaked - and any decision toward disclosure requires that Senate Intelligence Committee be notified in advance of this.


So how did they determine that a phone call between Flynn and the Russians was a phone call between 2 foreign powers? Okay, the Russians are a foreign power - but Flynn??
Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch even care??

The politically-inspired crooks of the Obamagate scandal are all tripping over themselves in their denials that they had anything to do with the unmasking or, even worse, anything to do with the spying on Flynn in the first place. Why? Because whoever authorized this spying and whoever committed the spying and unmasking Flynn's name broke federal laws but, much worse, whoever among them leaked Flynn's name could go to jail for 10 years for that crime. Look at how big a deal the democrats made of the little Valerie Plame affair, which never saw anyone charged with the leaking after a democrat friendly source was uncovered as the leaker. In Flynn's case, someone will likely have to go to jail. There is no way to cover up this crime this time.
 
What's most relevant here is that the govt wiretapped the political opposition. That's something that only happens in undemocratic banana republics, not in first world democracies.
Surveilling the political opposition was why Nixon ordered the break-in at the Watergate hotel, and why he was forced to step down from office.

If you believe in surveilling the political opposition, then you're saying something about yourself.
And don't try to call yourself more patriotic than everyone else for doing so - that's exactly why it's said that "Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels"

Obama Whitehouse wanted to surveil the political opposition, like in a banana republic, and then wanted to pin a criminal charge on one of the opposition in order to retro-actively justify this after the fact.

"Found a horseshoe, now let's go get a horse to go with it" :roll:


If you find that what was done was acceptable, then you should be willing to accept it being done to you and to your party - then see how you like it.

Flynn was not being wiretapped. The Russian Ambassador that he contacted was however. Which a man of Flynn's experience ought to have known was highly likely given that both the Russians and Americans commonly surveil the communications of each others diplomats. Nixon was forced out because he ordered a crime to be committed to break-in to the hotel room to steal information from the Democrats that he then tried to cover up. Trump considers Nixon to be a mentor and friend of his, so is anyone really shocked that he is engaging in the same kind of corrupt conduct? What we have now in this administration is a Banana Republic. If not worse. Idi Amin was smarter than this.
 
Back
Top Bottom