• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hallie Jackson asks Sanders: Does Trump truly believe that Dems hate Jewish people?

apdst said:
They didn't ban jack ****. They put on a show to cover their asses after Omar shot her stupid ass mouth off.

This should be called the "I have a minority friend" bill.
Click to expand...

Their actions are for all forms. You can call that covering their asses but it’s more action than your party of hate had done to protect people con.
 
JacksinPA said:
Hallie Jackson asks Sanders: Does Trump truly believe that Dems hate Jewish people?

MSNBC's Hallie Jackson asked Press Secretary Sarah Sanders: 'Does President Trump truly believe that Democrats hate Jewish people?' Sanders said: "That's a question, frankly, I think you should ask Democrats what their position is, since they're unwilling to call this what it is..." Hallie Jackson provides more analysis on the other key moments at the briefing – the first formal one since since Jan. 28.
===================================
There was recent (today) video on MSNBC has Trump on the phone in his office at Mar-a-Lago telling contributors (mostly rich southern FL Jews) that 'Democrats hate Jews.'

This back & forth on anti-Semitism charges is a new low in U.S. politics.
Click to expand...

This is just a polishing off of the Republican "Southern Strategy" and targetting the Jewish community instead of white southerners this time.

Divide and conquer
Rinse and repeat


Obvious is obvious. It won't work... this time.
 
Born Free said:
You wouldn't believe it if Obama stuc a knife into Netanyahu right in front of you.
Click to expand...

Binyamin Netanyahu made an unsolicited visit to do something never before done in the history of the United States, a foreign leader making an unannounced and unsolicited speech before Congress, attacking a sitting president.

The Israelis and Republicans worked out the details of the event without notifying the White House, to "make sure," in Boehner's words, "that there was no interference" from the administration.

A foreign government working directly with a US opposition party, breaching political protocol and allowing Congressional Republicans to freelance their own foreign policy independent of the White House.

But that's okay, right?

Here's what Boehner and Bibi's little AMBUSH accomplished:
It destroyed DECADES of BIPARTISAN support for Israel, by forcing American Jewish people to swear total fealty to Netanyahu or be branded antisemites themselves.

Nice, that's on you guys...forever.
It's all about the Binyamins, and by the way, he's being indicted on corruption charges next week, so you can kiss your Bibi lock on Israel policy goodbye.
 
sjmay said:
Naw, this is nothing new, it's been decades,

It's a fair question though considering instead of censoring the anti-semitics of the new congresswoman, they decided a better approach would be to group all hate and condem it, like....that needed to be re-affirmed for some reason, why cloak anti-semitism into everything....why not just call her out on it.....and move on, now it's just going to be in the news cycle more.
Click to expand...
GOP Congressman Steve King has said truly anti-Semitic statements. Why aren’t we talking about Republicans being anti-Semitic?
 
MTAtech said:
GOP Congressman Steve King has said truly anti-Semitic statements. Why aren’t we talking about Republicans being anti-Semitic?
Click to expand...

Agreed, and I believe some Republicans publicly rebuked him (not the President, that would be asking to much apparently) but some higher ranking republicans absolutely brought King to task on what he said.

Why haven't the Democrats brought Omar to task?
 
MTAtech said:
Democrats’ criticism of Ilhan Omar suggests little room for diversity on Israel
Click to expand...

Did you actually READ that article?

A. It doesn't name ONE top democrat who rebuked her, why?

B. Read this part "This time, they are taking things a step further. The Washington Post’s Mike DeBonis reported that some Democrats were so “enraged” by Omar’s comments that lawmakers plan to vote Wednesday on a House resolution condemning anti-Semitism.


The draft resolution “acknowledges the dangerous consequences of perpetuating anti-Semitic stereotypes” and “rejects anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States,” according to DeBonis. It does not specifically rebuke Omar."

So they are so enraged, that they came up with a resolution that DOESNT specifically rebuke, Omar, and not only that, the resolution was changed to PROTECT her, so that it included ALL sorts of hate etc.

Growing number of Republicans rebuke Iowa Rep. Steve King over 'white supremacy' comments - ABC News - Named Republicans rebuking King
House rebukes GOP'''s Steve King over racist remarks - Named Republicans

The only one I can find who is quoted as coming out against Omar, is Pelosi....and then they made a BS resolution to protect Omar...
 
Born Free said:
Obama sure was a racist, and he hates jews. Obama was on stage hugging Louis Farrakhan in support of his racism and hatred of Jews. Clinton stood on stage with Louis Farrakhan giving him a photo op in support of Farrakhan. Now the new movement against the people of Israel is wide open in the Democratic party.
Click to expand...

I've asked you this before, and you didn't do it.

Post a picture of Obama hugging Farrakhan and evidence that he hugged him "in support of his racism and hatred of Jews".
 
Praxas said:
So it's anti-semetic to ban hate and condemn it for all instead of JUST Jewish people? You guys are beyond help.
Click to expand...

All Lives Matter!
 
HonestJoe said:
Because she didn't say anything anti-Semitic?
Click to expand...

So then why are Democrats so enraged they had to put together a resolution at all, in the first place?
 
sjmay said:
So then why are Democrats so enraged they had to put together a resolution at all, in the first place?
Click to expand...
Politics I guess. It’ll be easier for them to put out the resolution for show than to defend her against any false accusations (and account for the other things she could be legitimately criticised for). You should always remember than none of this, from either side, has anything to do with protecting normal people (Jewish or otherwise), it’s all about winning the next election.
 
Criticizing Israel is not being anti-semitic. So sick of people making this bull**** accusation, its pathetic.

Israel is a country, and one that does ****ed up ****, and that has nothing to do with people practicing Judaism

Integrityrespec said:
The response of democrats to Ihlan Omar was to in effect make her the victim instead of deal with what she stated. Classic democrat politics.
Click to expand...

It's proving her quotes accurate. Those people all defensive because they are in fact taking money from Israel
 
HonestJoe said:
Politics I guess. It’ll be easier for them to put out the resolution for show than to defend her against any false accusations (and account for the other things she could be legitimately criticised for). You should always remember than none of this, from either side, has anything to do with protecting normal people (Jewish or otherwise), it’s all about winning the next election.
Click to expand...


Wait.....so she made comments and the Democrats figured out they got so mad over them, that they put out a resolution to intially rebuke her....then changed it to not rebuke her....because they believed her comments were nothing?

Cmon man, are you listening to yourself? Man, those words made me mad enough to rebuke her against any false words that she didn't mean.... seriously?
 
JacksinPA said:
Hallie Jackson asks Sanders: Does Trump truly believe that Dems hate Jewish people?

MSNBC's Hallie Jackson asked Press Secretary Sarah Sanders: 'Does President Trump truly believe that Democrats hate Jewish people?' Sanders said: "That's a question, frankly, I think you should ask Democrats what their position is, since they're unwilling to call this what it is..." Hallie Jackson provides more analysis on the other key moments at the briefing – the first formal one since since Jan. 28.
===================================
There was recent (today) video on MSNBC has Trump on the phone in his office at Mar-a-Lago telling contributors (mostly rich southern FL Jews) that 'Democrats hate Jews.'

This back & forth on anti-Semitism charges is a new low in U.S. politics.
Click to expand...

Democrats hate Jews? That's hilarious coming from a man who said that the people chanting; 'Jews will not replace us.' down in Charlottesville were otherwise "nice people".
 
Praxas said:
All you have done in this thread is lie. You think not supporting every Israel initiative is Jew hating and the fact is Obama is far from being a racist. Now you are accusing me of hating Jews which is just plain stupid. Now please show where my comments are hating Jews or everyone can see your lying.
Click to expand...

Really,

Now, I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts what role race played in that, but I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry. Number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. And that's just a fact

Why would Obama make a comment like that not knowing or seeing all the facts yet he brings up race. Why did he say “not seeing all the facts what role race played in that”. He said it because he knew it was a white officer who arrested his buddy. Now you think for a minute if a black officer made the arrest Obama would have said that.

Of course in Obama’s mind knowing the officer was white said the “Cambridge police acted stupidly”

As I said he knew the officer was white and Obama makes this remark “what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately”.

The only reason Obama made those comments was he knew the officer was white. If the officer was black Obama would not have said “not seeing all the facts what role race played in that” then he goes on to say without knowing all the facts except he knew the officer was white he says “Cambridge police acted stupidly” then last he gives us a lecture on race. Again he would not have done that if he knew the officer was black. Further by giving us a lecture on race he himself felt because the officer was white he must have been a racist. By Obama inferring he was a racist is the only reason he arrested his buddy. His whole career he’s surrounded himself with racist and the last of which is Van Jones. On stage Obama is seen hugging Louis Farrakhan supporting his racism and as a jew hater. Jeremiah Wright another racist.

Obama is a racist.
 
sjmay said:
Naw, this is nothing new, it's been decades,

It's a fair question though considering instead of censoring the anti-semitics of the new congresswoman, they decided a better approach would be to group all hate and condem it, like....that needed to be re-affirmed for some reason, why cloak anti-semitism into everything....why not just call her out on it.....and move on, now it's just going to be in the news cycle more.
Click to expand...

Isn't it crazy that the people who support Trump, a POTUS who literally has publicly supported Neo Nazis are now complaining about this?

Hard to believe people could be this hypocritical, but hey, the base always finds a way to surprise us. If you don't believe me, check this out:

Hail Trump: White nationalists mark Trump win with Nazi salute - BBC
 
Last edited:
Praxas said:
So it's cowardice to ban all hate instead of hate JUST against Jews, got it. :roll:
Click to expand...

Yep, that's the Trump way. And the majority of his base eats it up, which is why Trump's campaign strategy to excite the base is...

Trump’s Midterm Closing Argument: Pure Racial Fear

I find it interesting that Trump thinks his base is largely composed of cowardly racists, and his base is OK with this.

Praxas said:
All you have done in this thread is lie. You think not supporting every Israel initiative is Jew hating and the fact is Obama is far from being a racist. Now you are accusing me of hating Jews which is just plain stupid. Now please show where my comments are hating Jews or everyone can see your lying.
Click to expand...

That's all they have, to project their beliefs onto others. They support a POTUS who publicly defended Neo Nazis, and now they're trying to bring us down to their level. I'm glad to see you're not accepting this nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Born Free said:
Pelosi has no clue on how to handle this wave of jewish hatred, however this has been boiling for decades in the shift of support away from Israel to the Palestinians. She comes up with a broad brush approach to cover for Ohmar for her racist comments. And Ohmar has supporters in the Democratic party.

Democratic nay-sayers on Trump’s Jerusalem move are outright hypocrites

Most of the reaction to President Trump’s historic recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was predictable. But criticism from some Democrats was flat-out hypocritical.

That’s because many of those now bashing the move, which includes relocating the US Embassy from Tel Aviv, enthusiastically supported it when they felt sure it wouldn’t actually happen.

Such self-professed friends of Israel as Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) and Dick Durbin (Ill.) all criticized Trump’s decision.

Democratic nay-sayers on Trump’s Jerusalem move are outright hypocrites
Click to expand...

Oh boy, a newspaper owned by Murdock doesn't like democrats. That's news!
 
sjmay said:
Wait.....so she made comments and the Democrats figured out they got so mad over them, that they put out a resolution to intially rebuke her....then changed it to not rebuke her....because they believed her comments were nothing?
Click to expand...
Well for a start, I don’t believe all Democrats (even all senior people in the party) think the same thing (as with any other political parties too). I don’t know if anyone was angry at her or not and though the initial resolution was presented by some as a direct rebuke, I believe it would have been an entirely party-politically motivated response, creating the appearance of rebuking her to deflect the attacks against them. The shift in the resolution could have been a similar politically motivated response to attacks on them for overreacting. They’re following the common political line of trying to please everybody.

Regardless, nobody imagines that this resolution actually means anything in practice. Whatever you believe the politicians (on all sides) who voted for it actually believe, you can’t think their opinions have in any way changed as a consequence.
 
The Democratic Party has only one primary tactic and one ethic going back to their origins. The primary tactic is to promote and create as much social division as is possible by race, ethnicity, religion, age, sex, and income. The singular ethic is whatever gets votes - meaning pure amorality and total indifference to both morality and national interests.

In this, because there are 1.6 billion Muslims, the Democratic Party now will pick Muslims over Jews every time. It is not that the Democratic Party is directly anti-Semitic. Rather, the Democratic Party is now pro-Muslim - even if it means being against any smaller demographic such as Jews. Thus, they will not condemn a Muslim no matter what the person says against Jews as an amoral tactical calculation.
 
joko104 said:
The Democratic Party has only one primary tactic and one ethic going back to their origins. The primary tactic is to promote and create as much social division as is possible by race, ethnicity, religion, age, sex, and income. The singular ethic is whatever gets votes - meaning pure amorality and total indifference to both morality and national interests.

In this, because there are 1.6 billion Muslims, the Democratic Party now will pick Muslims over Jews every time. It is not that the Democratic Party is directly anti-Semitic. Rather, the Democratic Party is now pro-Muslim - even if it means being against any smaller demographic such as Jews. Thus, they will not condemn a Muslim no matter what the person says against Jews as an amoral tactical calculation.
Click to expand...

Huh. Literally nothing you just posted is based in reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom