• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump battles Meryl Streep with tweets as Cabinet picks prepare for grilling

Do we really have people so fundamentally dishonest as to continue that debunked lie about the reporter?

yep apparently so. Its easier to lie about Trump than for Liberals to tell us what is so bad about Trump that wasn't equally or worse about the Lying Bitch
 
Perhaps, but it was Trump who had claimed to have seen (thousands of?) cheering Muslims on NJ rooftops on the TV news - the memory of a print reporter makes no difference either way. It was Trump trying to deflect from his own memory loss (to be polite) that was very lame - there was no such TV news footage to back up the Trump "memory".
Irrelevant to this discussion
 
Trump supporters want him to be crass, insulting and offensive. They somehow view it as a positive character trait. All it is though is a reflection of them. Like school on a Saturday, no class.
 
Lol.....Plueeze keep this up, please keep attacking American voters Hollywood.

I especially liked when she said Hollywood actors were so villified. Aww....are we supposed to feel sorry fo you people?

These snowflake actors are such ******s... they would commit suicide if they had to put up with the crap Conservatives... or Trump had to put up with.

And her call for journalists to do their jobs!!! ROTFLMFAO... considering the past 40+ years, that's ****ing hilarious!!!

She doesn't have to worry... the Goebbels Inspired Media Propagandists (GIMPs) will continue to do what they've done for decades.
 
Perhaps, but it was Trump who had claimed to have seen (thousands of?) cheering Muslims on NJ rooftops on the TV news - the memory of a print reporter makes no difference either way. It was Trump trying to deflect from his own memory loss (to be polite) that was very lame - there was no such TV news footage to back up the Trump "memory".

I like to think we can do better than a president with memory loss also, so yeah that excuse is BS indeed
 
Streep needs to go back to her million dollar mansion, behind her security fence and STFU.

You just don't get it. The critics of Trump will only get louder and more numerous. Our values will not be sacrificed for a jerk like Trump. He is a disgrace to all Americans.
 
Trump supporters want him to be crass, insulting and offensive. They somehow view it as a positive character trait. All it is though is a reflection of them. Like school on a Saturday, no class.

We want him to get **** done.

We want him to drain the swamp.

We want him to defang the beast in DC.

We want him to cut regs.

We want him to create a climate for job creation.

We want him to cut taxes.

We want the wall built, and illegals stopped and removed.

For starters...

If he takes a few seconds now and again to smack arrogant, disconnected idiots like Streep for perpetuating a blatant lie... that's great.
 
Last edited:
so in your mind, the boo hoo battalion is sane?

In my mind Clinton and Trump were equally bad choices. Trump won. America lost. If Hillary had won America would have lost. If Hillary had won the Washington establishment, billionaires and Wall Street would have won. Trump won and the Washington establishment, billionaires and Wall Street have won.

Trump tweets, Hillary emails. America loses.
 
Trump supporters want him to be crass, insulting and offensive. They somehow view it as a positive character trait. All it is though is a reflection of them. Like school on a Saturday, no class.


Perfect.
 
These snowflake actors are such ******s... they would commit suicide if they had to put up with the crap Conservatives... or Trump had to put up with.

And her call for journalists to do their jobs!!! ROTFLMFAO... considering the past 40+ years, that's ****ing hilarious!!!

She doesn't have to worry... the Goebbels Inspired Media Propagandists (GIMPs) will continue to do what they've done for decades.

Snowflake actors. Someone has to tell your boy to stop having twitter-tantrums like a schoolgirl who got felt up in the drive-in.
 
stop the dishonesty. It had NOTHING to do with the disability. It was all about the memory loss.

Tell me-does Cruz have a physical disability?

your side's often glaring inability to accept reality is another reason why your asses got handed to you a couple months ago

If it had nothing to do with disability why did he say 'you should have seen this guy... ohhhhhhhhggggggg' with the retarded voice, with the clawed and flailing hands?

As for the Ted Cruz, there are similarities, because he was mocking Ted Cruz as if he was disabled. People draw comparisons like that in insults. It's why people call their non-disabled friends retarded or whatever. It's not really a nice thing to do because it equates the comparison to an insult, but it's an absolutely disgraceful thing to do to someone who is actually disabled.

I've sometimes yelled 'duuuuhhhh' in a dumb voice to my friends when they do something stupid and it's not an issue, but if I were to do that to an actual disabled person you can bet if my mother were there she would give me a slap in the face. For good reason. She didn't raise me to be a bozo. Like Reagan said, in my sig 'Boys will be boys, but boys will not be president'.

I get the cognitive dissonance that this was the only candidate that was gonna let you keep your guns but that doesn't mean you have to justify his other disgraceful behaviour.

EDIT: Also don't give me the whole 'dishonesty' spiel when you claim that Streep et al have been saying Trump mocked the guy because of his disability, when nobody is saying that's the case.
 
Last edited:
I'm not in hollywood and i'll attack american voters gladly, as i always have

No, actors aren't villified, at least not until the next "unamerican activities committee" puts them out of work again. But while i disagree with her, what Trump did is truly indefensible and only exposes the deplorables where they lie

Yea but youre even more irrelevent than they are and thats saying something.

Your'e attacks can just be ignored or debunked easily. Their attacks will be met with calls to boycott their movies and Hollywood in general

Hit them in the pocket books and lets see how outspoken they are
 
If it had nothing to do with disability why did he say 'you should have seen this guy... ohhhhhhhhggggggg' with the retarded voice, with the clawed and flailing hands?

As for the Ted Cruz, there are similarities, because he was mocking Ted Cruz as if he was disabled. People draw comparisons like that in insults. It's why people call their non-disabled friends retarded or whatever. It's not a nice thing to do to someone that isn't actually disabled because it equates the comparison to an insult, but it's an absolutely disgraceful thing to do to someone who is disabled.

I've sometimes yelled 'duuuuhhhh' in a dumb voice to my friends when they do something stupid and it's not an issue, but if I were to do that to an actual disabled person you can bet if my mother were there she would give me a slap in the face. For good reason. She didn't raise me to be a bozo.

I get the cognitive dissonance that this was the only candidate that was gonna let you keep your guns but that doesn't mean you have to justify his other disgraceful behaviour.

Cognitive dissonance indeed....

Streep gives standing ovation to convicted child rapist ..
FLASHBACK: Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at the 2003 Oscars – twitchy.com
 
Snowflake actors. Someone has to tell your boy to stop having twitter-tantrums like a schoolgirl who got felt up in the drive-in.

Trump saw what happened to Bush 43... the endless attacks.

He's smart to take these lying clowns on now and again.

Twitter is a great tool. Easy to correct the record... Takes a few seconds, and look at how it winds the Left up.
 
you seem to think that when it came down to the election, that we had more choices. we didn't. and trump was better than clinton. Now the sore losers are whining that Trump is bad and refuse to acknowledge that she was worse

Well obviously, because many of us still believe she was better than Trump. Just because we were outvoted doesn't mean we are wrong. Did you suddenly acknowledge that every democratic president was better than their republican counterpart just because they won? If she did win, then she, and the democratic party, would have had to answer for her flaws, just like how republicans now have to answer for Trumps.

Fact is, time to get over Hillary. Most liberals did back in 2016. She's not an excuse any more for the man you voted for being a ****ty human being.
 
Cognitive dissonance indeed....

Streep gives standing ovation to convicted child rapist ..
FLASHBACK: Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at the 2003 Oscars – twitchy.com

See my post in other thread on this topic:

I don't really care what Meryl Streep says or does, outside of when I'm trying to enjoy a movie she is in. She doesn't represent our country.

I do care what Donald Trump says or does, because he does represent our country. He did mock a disabled person, but he also shows here what a thin skin he has to criticism from citizens in general.

If someone is gonna make a fuss about Meryl Streep's quotes, a person who doesn't have a say in running our country, then maybe they need a safe space?
 
Nothing i said had to do with meryl streep. I'm talking about his mockery of the disabled, along with many other of his antics, will evoke disgust by anyone whose opinion is worth anything

This thread isn't about Trump's tweet to Meryl Streep? Wait, this thread IS about Meryl Streep. Try to focus here. Nice attempt at a diversion.

FyIxjSo.jpg

h1d03.jpg
 
Takes a few seconds, and look at how it winds the Left up.
That usually tends to be my take... how easy is is to get a rise out of the angry left!
 
We want him to get **** done.

We want him to drain the swamp.

We want him to defang the beast in DC.

We want him to cut regs.

We want him to create a climate for job creation.

We want him to cut taxes.

We want the wall built, and illegals stopped and removed.

For starters...

If he takes a few seconds now and again to smack arrogant, disconnected idiots like Streep for perpetuating a blatant lie... that's great.
He's going to get nothing done except make himself and his pals richer. He doesn't give two ****s about you or the common man. All he's doing is spoon feeding you and has base feel good things that they want to hear and you'll soon come to realize that.
 
We want him to get **** done.

We want him to drain the swamp.

We want him to defang the beast in DC.

We want him to cut regs.

We want him to create a climate for job creation.

We want him to cut taxes.

We want the wall built, and illegals stopped and removed.

For starters...

If he takes a few seconds now and again to smack arrogant, disconnected idiots like Streep for perpetuating a blatant lie... that's great.

What about if he takes a few seconds now and again to smack disabled peoples disabilities? Is that great? Is that what will make America great again?
 
Yea but youre even more irrelevent than they are and thats saying something.

Your'e attacks can just be ignored or debunked easily. Their attacks will be met with calls to boycott their movies and Hollywood in general

Hit them in the pocket books and lets see how outspoken they are

I remember when Palin attempted this. This is laughable. We all know what whores conservatives are for the things they whine about, because every single time there's a call for a boycott of hollywood it absolutely never happens at all. It's like the biggest crusaders against 'sexual immorality' get caught in the bathroom stalls with 'wide stance' Trump and ya'll care so much about Streep's insults because they can't get enough of her. Unlike Trump, she's in no position to harm anyone by her comments, so there can be no other explanation

And you want to talk about irrelevant, half of hollywood's profits come from *China* So yeah Trump and his fellow haters of the disabled will not be swaying anyone

But really, you'll just have to cope with the fact that a boycott won't happen because more people like and are willing to pay for Streep's movies than are willing to take 2 hours to go vote for Trump for free. Actually, that might explain why you're so pissed - you fear her influence
 
This thread isn't about Trump's tweet to Meryl Streep? Wait, this thread IS about Meryl Streep. Try to focus here. Nice attempt at a diversion.

View attachment 67212170

View attachment 67212171

Lol i couldn't give 2 ****s less about Streep or what she did in 2003. She's not the president, don't you get that. (notice no question mark because obviously you do not)

You hate the disabled more than you love trump, or you love trump enough to overcome your indifference to the disabled? That is the only question left here
 
Back
Top Bottom