• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge sides with Planned Parenthood over Mississippi abortion law

apdst said:
Ever hear of tax evasion?
Click to expand...


Everything you've brought up has been soundly refuted. In this case, you can at least wait for the time it takes to resolve the case before your are refuted again. I say that because you can't show me a successful case against Planned Parenthood. These cases against PP will keep coming.
 
bluesmoke said:
Everything you've brought up has been soundly refuted. In this case, you can at least wait for the time it takes to resolve the case before your are refuted again. I say that because you can't show me a successful case against Planned Parenthood. These cases against PP will keep coming.
Click to expand...

Actually, there hasn't been a single thing posted that refutes what I've said.

You know, the IRS uses illegal accounting tricks to build cases.
 
apdst said:
Actually, there hasn't been a single thing posted that refutes what I've said.

You know, the IRS uses illegal accounting tricks to build cases.
Click to expand...


Thanks. Now I understand where you are coming from.
 
bluesmoke said:
Thanks. Now I understand where you are coming from.
Click to expand...

It's all conspiracy theorist nonsense. They assert that something is true, then use that assertion to state that it must be true in a particular case without having a shred of evidence that it actually is.
 
Cephus said:
It's all conspiracy theorist nonsense. They assert that something is true, then use that assertion to state that it must be true in a particular case without having a shred of evidence that it actually is.
Click to expand...


His Ewok mind tricks won't work on me.
 
As a prolifer these state laws that get passed and then eventually shot down really upset me. All they do is hurt the movement and they are dumb. none of them are based on anything actually tangible and honest and that's why they often don;t get passed at all of eventually get repealed. Make no mistake about it, I want more restrictions but to be successful it has to be argued on rights and science not these cheap transparent dishonest gimmick pandering tricks that don't last. I know since people feel so strongly about this issue they are simply attacking on all fronts and anyway they can but it's actually counterproductive. It's going to make the fight HARDER and taint the whole movement as crying wolf.
 
bluesmoke said:
His Ewok mind tricks won't work on me.
Click to expand...

Or anyone else. The only people convinced by that kind of nonsense are the delusional people spouting it.
 
The Scott Roeder-style cases will continue to pop through the underbelly of the law, so we will begin to align the geography for the Clinton mafia that links the phenomenon, showing some resonance back to the Neolithic via Hodder's The Domestication of Europe. The first roadblock that one may come upon is the way Roeder DNA is made opaque in the records for Walmart-KKK country, Missouri, then note that if suspicion of espionage has come up in connection with the Chappaqua Blue Racer, it's certainly not unfounded, as we will be showing. Until then, the reader is quite free to jump ahead to Rote Kapelle (Red Orchestra) for the link.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom