• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof That Dinosaurs and Man Co-Existed

Ploughboy

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 16, 2018
Messages
824
Reaction score
40
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood. But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!

The Bible does not go into great detail on dinosaurs but there are a few passages that refer to dinosaurs.

Isaiah 51:9,

Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of the Lord; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon?


Jeremiah 51:34,

"Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon hath devoured me, he hath crushed me, he hath made me an empty vessel, he hath swallowed me up like a dragon, he hath filled his belly with my delicates, he hath cast me out."

The word "dragon" is the Hebrew tannîyn which has a broad meaning when applied to living creatures on earth. But in some verses it describes what many believe are dinosaurs. Consider the Strong's Definition:

Strong's H8577:
תַּנִּין tannîyn, tan-neen'; or תַּנִּים tannîym; (Ezekiel 29:3), intensive from the same as H8565; a marine or land monster, i.e. sea-serpent or jackal:—dragon, sea-monster, serpent, whale.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h8577

Then there is this from the BDB
Brown-Driver-Briggs' Hebrew Definitions
תּנּים תּנּין

1. dragon, serpent, sea monster
a. dragon or dinosaur
b. sea or river monster
c. serpent, venomous snake
Origin: intensive from the same as H8565
TWOT: 2528b
https://studybible.info/strongs/H8577

There is also a passage from the ancient Book of Job about a very large Sauropod:

Job 40:15-19,
15 “Look now at the behemoth
which I made along with you;
he eats grass like an ox.
16 See now his strength is in his hips,
and his power is in the muscles of his belly.
17 He moves his tail like a cedar;
the sinews of his thighs are wrapped together.
18 His bones are like strong pieces of brass;
his bones are like bars of iron.
19 He is the first of the works of God;
He who made him can bring near His sword.

Verse 17 in the Bishop's Bible is more clear:

When he wyll, he spreadeth out his tayle lyke a Cedar tree, all his sinowes are stiffe

This is a very large creature. The description here sounds a lot like a Sauropod. In the next post I will lay down a case in support of these Biblical passages. You can decide for yourself whether this solves the dinosaur mystery or not. Also keep in mind that the word dinosaur is a modern word first coined by Sir Richard Owen in 1841.

*Note: Not all references to dragon in the KJV mean dinosaur. Only a couple of those dragon verses can mean dinosaur. I will not be covering all verses in this topic. I do believe the next post provides enough answers for all of us.
 

Attachments

  • cave-drawings-of-dinosaurs-this-is-reputed-to-be-the-oldest-cave-painting-in-the-world-which.jpg
    cave-drawings-of-dinosaurs-this-is-reputed-to-be-the-oldest-cave-painting-in-the-world-which.jpg
    102.4 KB · Views: 151
  • b350cd95d32372d21937c70fedfb962d_caveman-drawings-of-dinosaurs_300-198.jpg
    b350cd95d32372d21937c70fedfb962d_caveman-drawings-of-dinosaurs_300-198.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 151
  • Kachine-Bridge-Petroglypy-enhanced.jpg
    Kachine-Bridge-Petroglypy-enhanced.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 151
  • Axel-Photo-Amazon-Warriors-and-Dinosaur2-300x225.jpg
    Axel-Photo-Amazon-Warriors-and-Dinosaur2-300x225.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 151
  • de Yamón, Perú.JPG
    de Yamón, Perú.JPG
    27.4 KB · Views: 151
There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood. But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!

The Bible does not go into great detail on dinosaurs but there are a few passages that refer to dinosaurs.

Isaiah 51:9,




Jeremiah 51:34,



The word "dragon" is the Hebrew tannîyn which has a broad meaning when applied to living creatures on earth. But in some verses it describes what many believe are dinosaurs. Consider the Strong's Definition:

Strong's H8577:

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h8577

Then there is this from the BDB

https://studybible.info/strongs/H8577

There is also a passage from the ancient Book of Job about a very large Sauropod:

Job 40:15-19,


Verse 17 in the Bishop's Bible is more clear:



This is a very large creature. The description here sounds a lot like a Sauropod. In the next post I will lay down a case in support of these Biblical passages. You can decide for yourself whether this solves the dinosaur mystery or not. Also keep in mind that the word dinosaur is a modern word first coined by Sir Richard Owen in 1841.

*Note: Not all references to dragon in the KJV mean dinosaur. Only a couple of those dragon verses can mean dinosaur. I will not be covering all verses in this topic. I do believe the next post provides enough answers for all of us.

Dinosaurs went extinct about 65 million years ago (at the end of the Cretaceous Period), after living on Earth for about 165 million years. If all of Earth time from the very beginning of the dinosaurs to today were compressed into 365 days (1 calendar year), the dinosaurs appeared January 1 and became extinct the third week of September. (Using this same time scale, the Earth would have formed approximately 18.5 years earlier.) By comparison, people (Homo sapiens) have been on earth only since December 31 (New Year's eve). The dinosaurs' long period of dominance certainly makes them unqualified successes in the history of life on Earth.



Dinosaurs were the dominate life on Earth for 165 million years until a meteor strike wiped them all out except for birds. That happened 65 million years BEFORE even man's primate ancestors existed. Those pictures are fakes. In terms of their sheer longevity, Dinosaurs rate at the top of the tree of life. Mankind will never last 165 million years. We are just a "flash in the pan" compared to the Dinos.
 
Last edited:
This cave drawing of a Sauropod was discovered on a rock ledge at the edge of the Amazon rain forest basin in northern Peru. It shows 9 warriors hunting this giant Sauropod.
de Yamón, Perú.JPG

Authentic cave drawing of a Sauropod being hunted by human warriors for food. It is believed that some dinosaurs suvived the Flood and either died to environmental changes or were hunted into complete existion like many other mammals and birds have been. So this shows the what could be the last Sauropod on earth being killed by man LOL! Well, what are humans best at if not hunting creatures down to extinction, right? Look up Haast eagle which was once a well known eagle which was hunted into extinction. There are many creatures now gone from the earth that most people never heard of before which have only been extinct for 200 to 300 years. Go back further in time and see how dinosaurs were also hunted into extinction.
Axel-Photo-Amazon-Warriors-and-Dinosaur2-300x225.jpg

There was a time when I thought this drawiing was a forgery because the details are so perfect. However, this drawing is considered one the oldet cave drawings in the world and is absolutely authentic..
This was drawn by North American Anasazi Indians that lived in the area that has now become Utah between 150 B.C. and 1200 A.D.
Kachine-Bridge-Petroglypy-enhanced.jpgb350cd95d32372d21937c70fedfb962d_caveman-drawings-of-dinosaurs_300-198.jpgcave-drawings-of-dinosaurs-this-is-reputed-to-be-the-oldest-cave-painting-in-the-world-which.jpg
 
I am an avid fossil hunter in the bone valley in Fl. While no expert, I have seen nothing to suggests this is true. Bonus photos of some findsPB030001.jpgPB030003.jpgPB030010.jpg
 
Buddhist temple in Cambodia reveals an engraving of a Stegosaurus.
steg3.jpgFigure-11-Stegosaurus-Goat-Horse.jpg3611822930_717548f956_o.jpg.CROP.promo-large2.jpg250px-Stegosaur_carving.jpg

Another gift from Peru in the form of a Sauropod ceramic artifact. There are many ancient dinosaur artifacts found long long before the Darwinian scheme on history.

Dennis-Swift-Sauropod-Ceramic.jpg
 
Every cave painting, engraving and pottery posted here is 100% authentic. It proves that ancient man had encounters with dinosaurs that survived the Flood. The Book of Job is very ancient and in most all literature of the 2000 B.C. era we will find some literary evidence for dinosaurs and man and all ancient antiquity. I have not investigated the dragon legends of China and India yet. I did find a couple from ancient Sumer in which took me some time in the Sumerian lexicon to confirm the meaning of a single word. But the Sumerians also mention dinosaurs.
 
Show me some proof that is verified by Paleontologist in the fossil record. Common knowledge is dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, eons before our ancestors first appeared.

I will trust the fossil record, far before a cave painting.

But I have an open mind
 
Show me some proof that is verified by Paleontologist in the fossil record. Common knowledge is dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, eons before our ancestors first appeared.

I will trust the fossil record, far before a cave painting.

But I have an open mind

You are merely parroting what evolutionists want you to believe. These cave painting are 100% authentic and so is the engraving on the Buddhist temple. These things are not fossils either. They are, however, proof dinosaurs and man co-existed and it was the Flood that wiped them out (though some did survive and even remain today).
 
There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood. But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!

The Bible does not go into great detail on dinosaurs but there are a few passages that refer to dinosaurs.


When was "the Flood" scientifically proven?

(Let's just start there.)
 
You are merely parroting what evolutionists want you to believe. These cave painting are 100% authentic and so is the engraving on the Buddhist temple. These things are not fossils either. They are, however, proof dinosaurs and man co-existed and it was the Flood that wiped them out (though some did survive and even remain today).

I am a Christian and like I have said, an avid fossil hunter in the bone valley region of Fl. Look up the Peace river valley. World famous for fossils, though I have not found the first dinosaur fossil.

Wonder why? (of the thousands of fossils I have found)

Because Fl was sea bed 65 million years ago.

People might call me many things on DP, but most would agree I am the most well known fossil guy on DP.

I have spent thousands of hours in the field (and have the collection to prove it)

I can present proof (from my own personal experience, as well as established and well known paleontological science)

If you want to debate this topic with bonafide experts, might I Recommend "the fossil forum" Several professors of paleontology post there.

I post there as well. PM me if you join, I wont post my username due to the stalkers here.

Like I said, my mind is open but you have not posted proof.

More of my finds, not a Dino bone amongst themPB030005.jpgPB030008.jpgPB030012.jpg
 
There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood. But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!

The Bible does not go into great detail on dinosaurs but there are a few passages that refer to dinosaurs.

Isaiah 51:9,




Jeremiah 51:34,



The word "dragon" is the Hebrew tannîyn which has a broad meaning when applied to living creatures on earth. But in some verses it describes what many believe are dinosaurs. Consider the Strong's Definition:

Strong's H8577:

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h8577

Then there is this from the BDB

https://studybible.info/strongs/H8577

There is also a passage from the ancient Book of Job about a very large Sauropod:

Job 40:15-19,


Verse 17 in the Bishop's Bible is more clear:



This is a very large creature. The description here sounds a lot like a Sauropod. In the next post I will lay down a case in support of these Biblical passages. You can decide for yourself whether this solves the dinosaur mystery or not. Also keep in mind that the word dinosaur is a modern word first coined by Sir Richard Owen in 1841.

*Note: Not all references to dragon in the KJV mean dinosaur. Only a couple of those dragon verses can mean dinosaur. I will not be covering all verses in this topic. I do believe the next post provides enough answers for all of us.

Sorry the Bible and cave drawings are not the least bit reputable as sources. Dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago the earliest ancestor of man existed 6 million years ago and Modern Man has existed for 200,000 years.

Dinosaurs coexisting with man is as far-fetched as Klingons coexisting with man
 
Threads like these can be summed up in one illustration:

em7rG20.jpg
 
Sorry the Bible and cave drawings are not the least bit reputable as sources. Dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago the earliest ancestor of man existed 6 million years ago and Modern Man has existed for 200,000 years.

Dinosaurs coexisting with man is as far-fetched as Klingons coexisting with man

So you are willing to ignore cave drawings of Sauropods that evolutionists admit are Sauropods? Why are their cave drawings of Sauropods and an engraving of a Stegosaurus on a Buddhist temple? So you will ignore all this and just trusted what evolutionists tell you to believe in spite of hard evidence? Typical atheist.
 
Sorry the Bible and cave drawings are not the least bit reputable as sources. Dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago the earliest ancestor of man existed 6 million years ago and Modern Man has existed for 200,000 years.

Dinosaurs coexisting with man is as far-fetched as Klingons coexisting with man

Even as a Christian (non religious, but believe in Christ) I need to couple faith with evidence (the two are not always mutually exclusive)

Between science and faith, I doubt a single Homo Sapeins, ever laid eyes on a living dino. The evidence beneath our feet, trumps an unverifiable cave painting.
 
Threads like these can be summed up in one illustration:

em7rG20.jpg

Another atheist who is gonna ignore evidence for the sake of his political views. Typical.
 
Show me some proof that is verified by Paleontologist in the fossil record. Common knowledge is dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, eons before our ancestors first appeared.

I will trust the fossil record, far before a cave painting.

But I have an open mind

I read a little bit about something called Ica stones found in Peru by this culture That was supposed to be killed by a flood but somehow managed to survive until the Conquistadors landed maybe all that's fake too.

They're not sure whether the stones are hoaxes but they most likely are. Or people are misinterpreting them to mean something other than what they mean.

Kind of like the way people misinterpret the Easter Island Maoi to be some sort of alien race. Or maybe the way some culture would misinterpret Chewbacca action figure to be some sort of representation of what man look like or a creature that coexisted with man some 5000 years from now when they're digging up our civilization.

Maybe they saw a skeleton it's not like they couldn't the first T-rex skull was found by a farmer not an archaeologist.
 
Another atheist who is gonna ignore evidence for the sake of his political views. Typical.

The bible is not evidence of any kind. It's a fantasy anthology.

Wrong, I believe in Christ but I also trust paleontological science on this topic.
I was referring to this thread, not you in particular. Reading comprehension 101, dude.
 
So you are willing to ignore cave drawings of Sauropods that evolutionists admit are Sauropods?
no no I don't ignore them maybe they found a skeleton it's not like they didn't know what a skeleton was people have those surely they encountered them the animals that ate had those so they definitely encountered them the first T-Rex head was found by a farmer not an archaeologist.

But if you're going to tell me that every scrap of science from the past 200 years is wrong because there is a cave painting then no I don't buy it.

Why are their cave drawings of Sauropods and an engraving of a Stegosaurus on a Buddhist temple?
well I already said maybe they found a fossil.

So you will ignore all this and just trusted what evolutionists tell you to believe in spite of hard evidence? Typical atheist.
no I'm going with hard science the fossil record for example.
 
Even as a Christian (non religious, but believe in Christ) I need to couple faith with evidence (the two are not always mutually exclusive)
to me (just my opinion) it's a measure of good faith that you can believe in Christ and still accept science.

Between science and faith, I doubt a single Homo Sapeins, ever laid eyes on a living dino. The evidence beneath our feet, trumps an unverifiable cave painting.

In all fairness a cave painting could have been created up on site of a fossil. That's assuming the cave paintings are genuine I have my doubts.

Mankind certainly never coexisted with Dinosaurs. The fossil record proves this.
 
I am a Christian and like I have said, an avid fossil hunter in the bone valley region of Fl. Look up the Peace river valley. World famous for fossils, though I have not found the first dinosaur fossil.

Wonder why? (of the thousands of fossils I have found)

Because Fl was sea bed 65 million years ago.

People might call me many things on DP, but most would agree I am the most well known fossil guy on DP.

I have spent thousands of hours in the field (and have the collection to prove it)

I can present proof (from my own personal experience, as well as established and well known paleontological science)

If you want to debate this topic with bonafide experts, might I Recommend "the fossil forum" Several professors of paleontology post there.

I post there as well. PM me if you join, I wont post my username due to the stalkers here.

Like I said, my mind is open but you have not posted proof.

Why are you trying so hard to change the subject? Is this topic about fossils? No, it isn't. Its about an engraving of a Stegosaurus on an ancient Buddhist temple, two cave drawings of Sauropods, and an ancient pottery with a Sauropod on it. But you want to talk about things unrelated to the evidence because you do not care about the evidence. To me the evidence is clear. You can also read the Biblical verses listed and then you might be able to better understand those passages by examining the artifacts presented here.

The Flood is a fact. You want to talk like you know so much about fossils the perhaps you need to go to South America and look at all the whale fossils in the Andes! I know, atheists claim geological uplifts put them there. :roll: But that lousy excuse does not explain how the whales became fossils in the first place. And don't say whale falls become fossils because that has been well refuted in science as the video below proves.


As you can see in this video whale falls don't produce fossils. This means there are no fossilized uplifts from tectonic plates placing whale fossils in mountain ranges.

Here is more on fossils. This video is where an evolutionist admits off camera the cave drawing is a Sauropod. He is not allowed to admit that on camera or he may be fired.


We all know what the artifacts are. But how many of you atheists have to balls to admit that? Do you like living a lie so much that you will force yourself to dismiss all evidence that disagrees with your view on Godless evolution? How much information are you willing to ignore to keep your faith in atheism?

And no, I do not consider anyone who believes in evolution a Christian. Denying the power of God is not a Christ-like quality. I don't see why God could not have created everything in the 6 day time frame He said He did it all in.
 
to me (just my opinion) it's a measure of good faith that you can believe in Christ and still accept science.



In all fairness a cave painting could have been created up on site of a fossil. That's assuming the cave paintings are genuine I have my doubts.

Mankind certainly never coexisted with Dinosaurs. The fossil record proves this.

I already did the research and all artifacts here are 100% genuine. But you will probably force yourself to deny all evidence that goes against your faith in evolution.
 
The bible is not evidence of any kind. It's a fantasy anthology.


I was referring to this thread, not you in particular. Reading comprehension 101, dude.
I was pointing out, Christians can still believe and be scientific.

Your stereotyping meme does not apply to all. I guess when you let a meme do your talking, you run the risk of being misinterpreted.

I guess you just jumped in the thread, or you would know my position....
 
Threads like these can be summed up in one illustration:

em7rG20.jpg

I guess it's the psychologist in me but I actually find these sorts of discussions quite interesting. How someone could so easily believe something so preposterous. If you believe in God and Jesus in you believe they are God and Jesus why would we need to disprove science in order to support this belief. Is it more about God or is it more about the Bible and the way we were brought up to accept it?


It really makes me wonder what goes wrong with people that don't stop and question this.
 
Back
Top Bottom