• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof That Dinosaurs and Man Co-Existed

Misinterpret the art? Look at the artifacts for yourself. What is there to misinterpret? Read the Job passage and then look at the art. No such creature on earth fits the passage and the artifacts better than the Sauropod. And what is a Stegosaurus doing on a Buddhist temple if some Buddhist didn't see one? Perhaps they worshiped it?

Then there is this account in the Apocrypha
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Bel+and+the+Dragon+1-30&version=RSV

There is dino literature all over the world as well, from Sumer to China and India. In fact, China's national symbol is a dinosaur (dragon).
I have repeatedly stated maybe they found a fossil. You have repeatedly ignored that I wonder why?
 
More of that atheist denial. Must suck to have to force yourself to deny all evidence that goes against evolution politics...I mean, theory.

Im not an atheist, Im a Pastafarian. The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true god.
 
I do not care about your fossil treat right now. I want to talk about the artifacts. But hey, forget the artifacts because to include them in this discussion would mean a scientific inquiry which evolutionists will never allow. How is denying evidence science? Sounds much more like communist ideology to deny scientific evidence. The communists would deny all evidence that goes against communism. But science denies no evidence. The artifacts prove dino and man co-existed. This is a big problem where the evolutionary timeline is concerned.

You do realize that archeology and paleontology are closely related fields that often sift dirt in the same screen, together?
 
Well then you're not very good at finding fossils.
to be honest I wasn't trying I was teaching youth gun safety I just happened to find fossils and where I was looking it seems to be very rich in bivalve fossils

So fair enough I'm probably pretty bad at finding fossils I have no idea where to look I'm not an archaeologist or a paleontologist.

There are people out there every day finding dinosaur graveyards and you can't even find a single fossilized dino bone?
again I'm not looking I'm trying to become a certified welding inspector I don't have time to look for fossils

So let me get this straight. Anything that disagrees with evolution cannot be accepted as evidence.
wait a minute evolution or the dinosaurs and men are separated by 65 million years?

Do confuse Evolution also with the origin of the species or the origin of life because these are all different theories that you may contribute to evolution or that Evolution was built on but it isn't Evolution per se.



How is that science? That is not science at all...that's desperate politics! Science does not deny any evidence. But atheists deny all evidence that disagree with their politics.
Renting about atheists again.

What's not science that the time between the fall of the dinosaurs and man is 65 million years and that's not the same thing as evolution or that it is?

This is all very confusing are you trying to deny Evolution in the totality are you trying to deny that the timeline exists as we know it.

You are all over the map do you know the difference?
 
I do not care about your fossil treat right now. I want to talk about the artifacts. But hey, forget the artifacts because to include them in this discussion would mean a scientific inquiry which evolutionists will never allow. How is denying evidence science? Sounds much more like communist ideology to deny scientific evidence. The communists would deny all evidence that goes against communism. But science denies no evidence. The artifacts prove dino and man co-existed. This is a big problem where the evolutionary timeline is concerned.

I was not actually speaking to you, I realize you are not interested in evidence, by your lack of posting any.
 
That was all created out of the FSM's noodley appendages!

Holy head wear.
AllCladSSColanderSHF16
 
Drivel? Is that an atheist code word that means you have no rational way of examining the evidence? You're gonna force yourself to deny it and all for the sake of socialist politics. I always knew atheists hated science!

Drivel.
 
Every cave painting, engraving and pottery posted here is 100% authentic. It proves that ancient man had encounters with dinosaurs that survived the Flood. The Book of Job is very ancient and in most all literature of the 2000 B.C. era we will find some literary evidence for dinosaurs and man and all ancient antiquity. I have not investigated the dragon legends of China and India yet. I did find a couple from ancient Sumer in which took me some time in the Sumerian lexicon to confirm the meaning of a single word. But the Sumerians also mention dinosaurs.



They were the Aliens pets. Proof from the Mayans that Aliens were here:

alien1.JPG
 
Another atheist who is gonna ignore evidence for the sake of his political views. Typical.

I'm a practicing Christian and politics has nothing to do with it, you are posting garbage and the ignorance is an embarrassment to Christianity.
 
Evolution is not science. Modern science was a Christian endeavor and no atheists were present when modern science was established. All the founding fathers of modern science were Bible believing Christians. Evolution is an ancient pagan theory that nature made itself. This ancient theory is not science but mysticism. It is completely incompatible with Biblical creation and real science.

EvolutionGravTheory.jpg

I truly do not understand how some people can function in society.
 
Funny how atheists will deny all evidence for the sake of politics. That is not being a truth seeker. That is being faithful to a theory that the evidence presented here refutes.

All the artifacts here are genuine. In fact, the cave drawing that looks the least genuine is actually considered one of the oldest cave drawings in the world. Its real and now atheists have to deal with the reality that the evolutionary timeline is proven false.

I didnt see the links that show the scientific dating of the dinosaurs, specifically, in those cave drawings. Do you have sources?
 
Funny how atheists will deny all evidence for the sake of politics. That is not being a truth seeker. That is being faithful to a theory that the evidence presented here refutes.
If your faith was strong enough, you wouldnt 'need' proof. Needing proof is the opposite of the faith that Our Lord asks from us.

(And I'm a practicing Christian. What you posted in this thread is ludicrous)
 
I didnt see the links that show the scientific dating of the dinosaurs, specifically, in those cave drawings. Do you have sources?

They are from the Plasticine Era.
 
I have never felt the moon, but, I know it is there. Dinosaurs that are alive, I have no proof, but I know they were on earth millions of years ago. Saying humans and dinosaurs were around the same time only undermines religion. It is a fantasy to say humans have been around thousands of years and without a Jesus died without going to heaven. Plus taking over 1900 years for everyone having the choice with a Christian god (except for a island in the Indian Ocean without any modern contact). If humans are more then 65 million years old, only makes organized religion more stupid and the following more silly.
 
Barking up the wrong Archaeopteryx

There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood. But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!

The Bible does not go into great detail on dinosaurs but there are a few passages that refer to dinosaurs.



Piffle. If those photos are from the Utah site, they've already been assessed by paleontologists. See https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/debunking-the-dinosaurs-of-kachina-bridge-96018102/

"To support their fantastical claims, some creationists cite what they believe to be various sculptures, carvings and other artistic representations of dinosaurs made by ancient cultures around the world. Most of these have been discredited as forgeries and misinterpreted objects, but creationists continue to use them as evidence for their peculiar view of earth history. Among the most oft-cited is a petroglyph of what appears to be an Apatosaurus-like sauropod on Kachina Bridge in Utah’s Natural Bridges National Monument."

Read more: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/scie...-kachina-bridge-96018102/#UoKXsbY4lsoYzTdc.99
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

(My emphasis - more @ the URL)
 
There are the living fossils such as crocodiles and komodo dragons which never went extinct in the Flood.
The what now?

Komodo Dragons are not dinosaurs, by the way. They evolved less than 1 million years ago.


But other dinosaurs did survive the Flood only to go extinct later. If it can be demonstrated that dinosaurs living during the same time as mankind, then that places evolution theory is a serious and unsolvable dilemma!
It cannot be demonstrated.

"The Flood" is a myth. It didn't happen. The events described in the Tanakh are, to put it mildly, utterly impossible.

No one has found dinosaur fossils to back up your assertion.

Dragons and sea monsters are mythical creatures, not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs did not breathe fire and hoard gold.

Like the cave paintings, you are just seeing what you want to see.
 
Nice! Those megalodon teeth you got there?

One is, sorta small at two inches but flawless and bi-colored. Fragments are common, whole ones? Not so much. The other large ones are an extinct type of mako. They can reach three inches. The largest meg is just over 7 inches. I would probably pee on my self if I found a 4 inch meg.
 
Back
Top Bottom