- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 27,254
- Reaction score
- 9,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
So? Your absolute statements remains debunked.
Yeah okay, keep trying to pretend its us that are the cowards.
Its you that feel you need one.
So? Your absolute statements remains debunked.
Yeah okay, keep trying to pretend its us that are the cowards.
Its you that feel you need one.
All I am saying is that the gun nuts out there have gotten so irrational in the last 20 years that you can't even propose something reasonable like banning high capacity magazines.
Its you that feel you need one.
LOL more idiocy. where in the US Code is that idiocy to be found?
the police are civilian agencies
do you just lie because you are outgunned or out of ammo in this topic
More lies from you. Can you quote me claiming to need one?
Lachean: "Yes, for self defense"
Is it your claim that police have the same gun restrictions as civilians?
different ranges-different guns-home defense in the home-Mossberg Mil Spec 12G with a flash light, block 19 with a flash light
dealing with threats on the farm where shots of up to 800M are possible Rock River M4 carbine with a scope and a roll over Gen 3 NVD
Yes, from the poll above -
Of course I would, I still need one, a revolver, a black powder and a 1911 to complete my collection.
I would use it for sport, probably never for home defense. I have my 12 gauge for that.
why are you on this thread?
btw look up Public Law 97-86, Title 10 USC chapter 18
I seriously doubt there will be a danger shots over 500m...or really even 15m. Also keep in mind I live in Florida. Good luck finding an open space that you can make a shot like that. A shotgun will do just fine. If it is outside the range of a shotgun...what the hell am I doing not taking cover and waiting for the police? lol.
when it comes to using a weapon against other people they often have more but because of wrongful laws they can use stuff other civilians cannot own.
why are you on this thread?
Recently, A Democrat senator suggested that he has no idea why anyone would need to have an assault rifle. His ignorance is the premise of his decision to limit the 2nd amendment. To me the answer is pretty easy.
I would own an assault reason for the exact same reason I would own a superfast sports car that is built to exceed legal speed limits. So that if the Chinese drilling off our coast where we are not allowed to ever decided to sneak soldiers and nukes into the gulf instead of oil rig workers and equipment and invaded Florida blitzkrieg style, I'd have a chance of getting out alive.
Seriously though, would you own an assault rifle? And if so, why?
I live on a farm-there are more things that might need killing then a mope
like coyotes in the horse field etc
and there are some cases where a car might be a target needing interdiction
I am here to fight for truth and justice and the American way.
Here is the flaw in your argument. You have put forth that 'banning high capacity magazines' is reasonable. It's no more reasonable than NYC banning soft drinks over a certain size. If a crazy person wanted to take out a lot of people, they'd just bring more mags. Or they'd just plant a bomb. There is no evidence that limiting the number of rounds per mag would make any difference. Would it help to pacify some of the anti-gun people, yeah, but that's all it would accomplish.
I understand the coyote lol. But if it is in Florida and outside of 50...you probably won't be seein it lol. Lotta woods here.
I find it highly improbable that you would need to shoot at a vehicle. I would pontificate that decision as a civillian. Shooting at a vehicle would PROBABLY not be considered self defense if it were outside 100m...let alone beyond 500.
Where does it say I "need it" for self defense. In fact, what post # was that? Can you link it?
It took the Unabomber 20 years to kill 3 people with bombs. High capacity magazines have been used in several mass murders in recent years. Its much easier to walk into a crowded place and start killing people when you don't have to reload. If it was not easier, then why do these psychopaths use them? They are not cut from the same cloth as some extreme jihadist that straps a bomb to themselves. These mass murderers are looking to shoot people, that’s what they want to do, and by letting them get off dozens of shots off without having to reload, all we do is make it easier for them.
I am here to fight for truth and justice and the American way.
Meetcha' in the phone booth.
Just look at the public poll above where you responded, "yes for self defense." Anyone can look there and see that is what your answer was to the poll question.
what do you consider a high capacity magazine
Depends on the gun, but in general in excess of 10 rounds.