- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Reagan didn't start off losing 4 million jobs like Obama did because he inherited the worst recession in 80 years. Not to mention, by this point in his presidency, Reagan lost more jobs than Obama, despite not inheriting an economy as bad as Obama did.Can you read the approval ratings? Do you understand the difference between having a pro growth economic plan like Reagan and a Micromanaging massive central govt. plan of Obama's? Apparently not thus you continue to be brainwashed by Obama. That 38% recent poll number for Obama is over 2 years after the end of the recession. Reagan ended up adding 17 million jobs. Think that Obama will generate those kind of numbers?
Regardless, both had low JARS during their presidency, yet you somehow think that translates into negative leadership qualities for Obama but positive leadership qualities for Reagan, even though Reagan's job approval sank lower than Obama's :roll:
Your own sycophancy destroys your position without me having to lift a finger.
Exactly who do you think believes you when you bald-face lie like that? If it were true that results mattered to you, there's no way in hell you would have voted for Bush in 2004. Half trillion dollar deficits year after year, lost the Twin Towers, invaded a country over WMD that weren't there. The only reason you voted for Bush was because he was a Republican -- no other reason.My standard has always been results