- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 5,120
- Location
- 0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
A highly inaccurate weapon that basically self-destructs and has serious risk of injury to the user or innocent bystanders? Yeah, why would anyone want to stop that from being sold?
Cars should have seatbelts. Guns shouldn't explode in the hands of the shooter.
First, it's not sold. Second, the overreaction is not from the threat of malfunction to users.
They don't make sense yet. Will that still be true 5 years from now?
It's not going to make sense until they pair it with other machines or come up with some revolutionary printing material. Photopolymers are really weak stuff.