mr4anarchy
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 458
- Reaction score
- 130
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If that was really true, then there would be no difficulty at all in getting the Constitution amended in order to supersede the Second Amendment, and to allow the right affirmed therein to be infringed to the degree of requiring these checks as a prerequisite for exercising that right. That no credible effort has been made to propose such an amendment proves that those who claim there is this much support are flat-out lying.
Um... we already have background checks, and SCOTUS doesn't see them as an "infringement". So... um, no need to amend the constitution.
I love how some folks throw that word "infringe" around like it's the be-all, end-all to understanding the 2nd Amendment.
"Infringing on the freedom of the press" is in the First Amendment, but Libel and child porn are still illegal.
Maybe NAMBLA and the NRA should pool their legal resources and stop all this "infringement" of rights.:roll: