Happens to the best of us.
Wow, good luck with all of that. You seem to have a view of politics derived from Bond movies, comic books and the movie OFFICE SPACE.
No, it's not. You need to actually read up on what authoritarian actually means, for starters, and then maybe take an econ class or two.
No, you have a mix up of a bunch of disparate occurrences that you have forced into a twisted world view that doesn't actually exist in the real world. Accidents happen, and the police have about the same mix of bad apples as the population in general, you just choose not to see that. You will never make a perfect police force because we are human and incapable of perfection.
Nope, none of that has anything to do with neo-Conservatism. And as far as proxy wars go, the last two were minuscule compared to Vietnam and Korea, both wars that were started by liberals and Vietnam was ended by a neo-Conservatives.
In short, you are full of crap. For you "NeoCon" is a catchall for your personal boogiemen. You have no clue what NeoConservatism actually is. YOu could as easily replace "NeoCon" in your screeds with "DogOwners" and be about as on the mark. :roll:
Not at all, Ludwig von Mises would say you are full of **** too.
1. Or maybe actually reading the history of the industrial revolution and the creation of the Republican Party in short the entire creation was to compete with the catholic immigrant way of life... Please explain to me how I am wrong
2. authoritarian
ɔːˌθɒrɪˈtɛːrɪən/
adjective
1.
favouring or enforcing strict obedience to authority at the expense of personal freedom.
If I expand the money supply to create an export subsidy and a roundabout import tariff to boost my production and sales while limiting supply, and in the meantime I'm causing prices in the aggregate to rise due to my expansionary policy would I be using force at the expense of your freedom inside the market to maintain lower prices through competition, yes or no
3. Accidents happen and I agree, but there are definitely instances where the abuse was not just an accident. This is by definition, when it occurs, state oppression. The fact that you, as a neocon, will be willing to turn a blind eye for the "better good' rather then admitting there's work to be done proves my assumption that neocons are in favor of being authoritarian, by the mere fact that you are willing to allow the state to oppress people in certain instances and not be so up in arms because, well, accidents happen. Meanwhile, i would be charged with major crimes.
4. Really?
A. Enhanced interrogation = torture neocon response " it's ok torture those terrorists they don't have rights"
B. Patriot act...neocon
C. Has every 'conservative" in office since Eisenhower expand the military spending?
6. No neocons are a product of what is wrong with this country, they aren't the boogie man. They favor immigration bands, they favor increasing war spending, they favor subsidizing big business in the name of the "free market" which literally makes no sense, they oppose Keynesianism through supply side economics which is literally just as bad. They are a product of the state plain and simple, and the worse of it all is is that a majority of them actually call themselves libertarians when they favor increasing military, police force, elastic currency, and the war on drugs! Neocons are a product of the corrupt state.
A little history lesson for you, in the 1890s when big business started buying up politicians like Sherman and McKinley, they implanted a corrupt crony named Brian into the grass roots Jeffersonian/Jacksonian democrats and turned them authoritarian. Now I'll give you modern democrats are worse, however, the literal history of the Republican Party is controlled by big business and using schemes as protectionist policy while they maintain a pseudo "free market" perspective.
7. Considering I've done exchange rate theory and monetary theory research papers on the writings of mises and his prodigies like Murray and Hayek, I'm pretty sure I understand the intellectual thinking of mises. In fact, considering you support an elastic currency, not only would he call you an authoritarian but he would say you're no better then a socialist