- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is the article you got that from, right?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/20/gay-rights-kentucky-rally_n_880482.html
Maybe you should have read further into the letter issued. It specifically says that the employee is Mr. Kim Haynes. Kim can be a name for a man. And it indicates that the employee is definitely a man.
Maybe Kim is gay. Would that be irony or what? :mrgreen: