ConsvLiberal
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2015
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 8
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Who should be the candidate for the Republicans in 2016?
Who should be the candidate for the Republicans in 2016?
Who should be the candidate for the Republicans in 2016?
Who should be the candidate for the Republicans in 2016?
My lean early on is Walker simply because of what he has accomplished as governor. But that could change. I'm looking forward to the debates especially on the subject of foreign affairs.
Good morning, Vesper. :2wave:
If Kasich gets in the race, would that make a difference to you? The reason I ask is because whoever gets the nod will have to carry both Ohio and Florida to even have a chance of becoming POTUS. I don't have a problem at all with Walker - I like what he has done and I would vote for him. I also like what Kasich has accomplished for our State, too.
LOL......seriously? Other than driving HP into the ground and being fired for her incompetence....how is Fiorina even close to being "Uniquely qualified"? Even Sarah Palin was more qualified than her.My dark horses are Fiorino and Trump. Neither have a shot buy I think both are uniquely qualified.
Good morning, Vesper. :2wave:
If Kasich gets in the race, would that make a difference to you? The reason I ask is because whoever gets the nod will have to carry both Ohio and Florida to even have a chance of becoming POTUS. I don't have a problem at all with Walker - I like what he has done and I would vote for him. I also like what Kasich has accomplished for our State, too.
LOL......seriously? Other than driving HP into the ground and being fired for her incompetence....how is Fiorina even close to being "Uniquely qualified"? Even Sarah Palin was more qualified than her.
My lean early on is Walker simply because of what he has accomplished as governor. But that could change. I'm looking forward to the debates especially on the subject of foreign affairs.
Good morning, Vesper. :2wave:
If Kasich gets in the race, would that make a difference to you? The reason I ask is because whoever gets the nod will have to carry both Ohio and Florida to even have a chance of becoming POTUS. I don't have a problem at all with Walker - I like what he has done and I would vote for him. I also like what Kasich has accomplished for our State, too.
Katich is a good choice. It's going to be tough to beat Bush's money though and he's got a serious head start.
Greetings, sawdust. :2wave:
I think Jeb Bush is a good man, but he's got the wrong last name for many people. That's so unfair, but it seems to be the case. Also many people do not want dynasties, which a Bush/Clinton face-off implies. You can't convince me that only the "elite" deserve to rule, because they're superior to everyone else - only in their own mind, BTW - which is something I consider Bull****! There have been many worthy people who couldn't get the backing or the money that is needed to even compete, and that's wrong. When third parties have to jump through hoops to even get on a ballot, things have gone badly wrong in this country. The old saying "anybody can grow up to become President" is no longer true. Sad...
Morning Pg :2wave: *hug*
Kasich has been around for a while, hasn't he? I see him sitting in for O'Reilly from time to time and he's always seemed likable to me. Do you think he has a chance?
I met Jeb at a charity golf outing. He was a nice guy. Spoke to you as if he didn't have anything better to do. Looked you in the eye, had a firm hand and a commanding presence. He's very likable. He was also a good governor for Florida and left office being popular in the state. I have some policy differenced with him but not enough that I couldn't vote for him. Also governors make the best presidents. The only knock about him that I have is that three Bush's in office is too many for my liking.
George P. Bush i a rising star behind him. Many see him as a future candidate. He is currently a Texas land commissioner. Too many Bush's though.