Your response here sets up a straw man. No one other than true communists or socialists believe that we should have a government that handles all your needs. So you are attacking an argument that very few people make. Broadly, what the majority of people believe, and what the majority of economists believe, is that a successful market economic system requires some safety nets provided by the public sector. Programs like unemployment insurance, health coverage for the poor, some form of a disability program, and so form of retirement assistance (possibly means tested), and some type of publicly subsidized health coverage for seniors (possibly means tested). These are components of every successful state on the planet. The only modern industrialized society on the planet that leaves this completely to the private sector is Hong Kong, but the catch is that Hong Kong requires residence to purchase disability insurance, health insurance, retirement investments / annuities, and a private sector provided unemployment insurance.
This libertarian utopia that guys like Ron Paul promote is not practiced anywhere.