Re: Taliban prisoner swap was ILLEGAL claims GOP as former federal prosecutor says it
I have posted no fabrications on this board on any issue.
I'd say you post nothing else.
There were no costs to Reagans tax cuts.
The real, per capita national debt increased by 92% under Reagan. If that's not a "cost," what is?
Which part of "The tax cuts resulted in nearly double the revenue" do you not understand?
Revenues, measured in constant (2009) dollars,
fell partly as a result of the tax cuts enacted in Reagan's first term. (The other major cause was the very serious recession his overall economic policies threw the country into.) After taxes, especially the regressive payroll tax, were dramatically
increased, and after the heavy fiscal stimulus that resulted from all that deficit spending took hold, revenues expanded.
1981 — 1366
1982 — 1310
1983 — 1214
1984 — 1290
1985 — 1376
1986 — 1404
1987 — 1517
1988 — 1562
1989 — 1640
That's a
20% increase over eight years.
I won't bother to go on. I don't see any point in it.
>>The president is in fact a liar
No he is not, and you cannot point to a single lie that's come from him.
>>He lied about his healthcare plan in order to get it passed.
No he did not.
What lie?
>>his administration has broken the law in many areas...in fact too many to discuss all of them here.
Very weak.
>>he broke the law in regards to notifying congress within 30 days of the Taliban-5 for deserter trade.
No, he did not. If he did, where's the court action to enforce the law?
>>But then Obama picks and chooses which laws he is going to enforce or abide by.
That is a lie. Which laws has he violated?
>>As for the question about "why do I not do anything about it in court? It's not my job, son. It is up to congress to hold the president accountable.
Why I said "you," I meant the liars who call the President a liar and a criminal. Why doesn't ANYONE do anything about these alleged crimes? The answer is simple and obvious: there
are no crimes. Understand?
>>And again......you are the only one I see whining. The rest of us are discussing the issues. You are whining about posts that you disagree with.
You can't point to a single instance of me "whining" because there are none. I'm not "whining about posts that I disagree with," but rather exposing them for what they are — nonsense, garbage, crap, fabrications, etc.
>>I am betting that you are not a strong supporter of the 1st amendment.
You can't seem to get anything right. The ACA is succeeding, and yer efforts to claim that it isn't are failing.