- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 9,796
- Reaction score
- 2,590
- Location
- out yonder
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Truth Detector;
First off, what part of my comments had anything “partisan” in them? Oh that’s right; NONE of them did.
Silly me, thinking you to be a PARTISIAN. :roll:
from post # 55. This interchange between two Democrats was priceless.
From post#60. The good news about this thread topic is that many are not falling for the BS this adminstration is spewing.
From post #64. The notion that my comments above are about nothing is merely another of your Liberal "because I say its so.
I see that aside from your being incapable of comprehending anything written in the English language you also have trouble distinguishing the terms “agenda” from “partisan.”
Your source and the data therein, are derived from an organization devoted to a single payer public healthcare system and make no bones about it. What part of AGENDA do you continue to not comprehend?
Only in TD land is “healthcare reform” considered an agenda, consider these facts TD.
Fact=National health spending is expected to reach $2.5 trillion in 2009, accounting for 17.6 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).
Fact=The average increase in national health expenditures is expected to be 6.2 percent per year, while the GDP is expected to increase only 4.1 percent per year.
Fact= The average employer-sponsored premium for a family of four costs close to $13,000 a year.
Fact=The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that job-based health insurance could increase 100 percent over the next decade.
Fact=Families USA’s mission is to achieve high-quality, affordable health coverage for everyone in the U.S.
After all of these facts TD are you saying that healthcare doesn’t need reforming?BY the way there is someone else that thinks healthcare needs reforming.
Who knows you might have even voted for this one.
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, said in a health care speech earlier this month: "We've got to stop that hidden tax. Everyone must be insured."
I am not sure if your are just intellectually incapable of comprehension or just selectively choosing to feign complete and utter ignorance.
Intellectually incapable of comprehension…. you must be looking in mirror . I think that’s your bag, after all you seem to confuse illegals with indigents.
As for the non-partisan BS, I find that claim on the website with the AGENDA amusing in that its founder is a complete and total Liberal Democrat. The notion that this is not a partisan issue certainly would require the willing suspension of disbelief:
So…it doesn’t alter the fact that 37% of insurance payments go for indigent care. Do you have anything to refute that,or are you just intent on smearing the messenger?
In 1997, Mr. Pollack was appointed by President Clinton as the sole consumer representative on the Presidential Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. In that capacity, Mr. Pollack helped prepare the Patients’ Bill of Rights that has been enacted by many state legislatures.
Mr. Pollack received his law degree from New York University where he was an Arthur Garfield Hays Civil Liberties Fellow.
See above.
:spin:Mr. Pollack was also the Founding Executive Director of the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC), a leading national organization focused on eliminating hunger in the U.S. Two of his notable accomplishment at FRAC include: (1) arguing two successful cases on the same day in the U.S. Supreme Court to secure food aid for low-income Americans; and (2) the successful federal litigation that resulted in the creation of the WIC program for malnourished mothers and infants.
Yada,yada,yada .Is that all you have, smear the messenger. How about proving him wrong instead of this BS your throwing out?
Last edited: