Still, your one of my favorite posters on here
but..no one wants to understand the other side, they want to just attack the other side ad nauseam with the same statements over and over...no one even pays attention to anyone that posts against it or what they say.
Problem is this. The reason that the same points are stated over and over is because you all don't seem to understand them. Here... let me demonstrate:
1) Define natural.
You all can't. Either you run from the definition, make up your own, or have to admit that homosexuality is natural based on the definition. Mostly, you all do either the first or the second. Do the third and it won't be mentioned again.
2) Define normal.
If you all define normal in the statistical sense, it doesn't get mentioned again. When you try to define normal in any other way or place a value judgement on normal, you all get skewered with being exposed for presenting logical fallacies, confronted with a fallacious definition, or both.
3) What is the difference between sexual behavior and sexual orientation.
When you all recognize that because someone is gay, it doesn't mean that they MUST act on this, it doesn't get brought up again. When you all equate certain sexual behaviors... usually anal sex, with homosexuality, your are shown how absurd that is. Straights do anal sex, not all gays do anal sex, and a behavior is an act whereas an orientation is a state of being.
4) Along with this, define gay sex.
When you admit that, with the exception of penis-vaginal intercourse, any sexual behavior can be practiced by anyone, this does not get mentioned again. But you all often try to define certain acts as "gay only". When you do, you fail, because as stated above, any other act can be practiced by anyone.
Now, I could easily go on, but you see, all you need to do is accept these facts... and they are facts, facts that NO ONE here can dispute, and these issues don't get mentioned again. Problem is, you all keep bringing up your inaccuracies and fallacies, so these things have to be explained over and over. I've probably done this debate 200+ times and explained the above just as many. It's getting tiring and I have been considering retiring from the SSM debate.
Regardless, if you want to believe that SSM should not happen because of your religious beliefs, that's fine and you will get no argument from me. You want to start PROVING that SSM should not happen, either logically or with evidence, and you will get demolished. There is no logical or evidenciary reason to keep SSM illegal. There is only religous faith... which I can accept.
So, the repitition of the SSM debate is due to the anti's, not the pro's.