- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
God created homosexuals, so God can thank himself!
Can God thank himself for murders and child molesters?
Nice fail!
God created homosexuals, so God can thank himself!
There's no unanimous circuit court decision. A refusal, by the SCOTUS means that it's no longer the Feds's jurisdiction, which means the states are allowed to enforce their own constitutions.
There are no atheists in foxholes or on their deathbed my left wing friend.
I don't think God will thank you for homosexual sex.
Can God thank himself for murders and child molesters?
I don't like the idea of changing the definition of marriage my left wing friend.
God created homosexuals, so God can thank himself!
Too damned bad. Times changed, you got left behind.
Gays created gays my left wing friend
Gays created gays my left wing friend but I could care less about that..I just don't want the definition of marriage changed. What part of that do you not understand?
As Yogi Berra once said my left wing friend, "Its not over until its over."
As Yogi Berra once said my left wing friend, "Its not over until its over."
Gays created gays my left wing friend but I could care less about that..I just don't want the definition of marriage changed. What part of that do you not understand?
SC State Supremes ruled correctly; the definition of marriage is part of our State Constitution, and should not be overturned by some indirect implied assumption about a ruling an APPELLATE court made about a law in another state.
It was right and proper for SCOSC to put a hold on this while the legal issues were examined and clarified, and possibly until after the State seeks further legal redress.
Gays created gays my left wing friend but I could care less about that..I just don't want the definition of marriage changed. What part of that do you not understand?
I don't think it is and I believe that's why SCOTUS refused to decide, because they might possibly be forced to overturn the circuit court rulings and hand the issue, in totality, to the states.
The 4th circuit's decision is binding for South Carolina, sorry. The SC Supreme Court knows full well what the outcome of this will be. There's no reason to grant an injunction because there's absolutely no expectation that any appeals will be successful. This is just pure, unadulterated spite on part of the SC AG and Supreme Court.
I thought you said homosexuals can't procreate.
There are no atheists in foxholes or on their deathbed my left wing friend.
Gays created gays my left wing friend but I could care less about that..I just don't want the definition of marriage changed. What part of that do you not understand?
LOL......pretty soon it will only be a handful few Southern States who still seek to impose governmental bigotry....but even those are soon to fall.
My prediction has come true. DP's resident homophobe has made a reappearance just as soon as some bigot court comes forth with a totally impotent ruling *against* SSM
He also said.
"I never said most of the things I said."
Yogi Berra
SC State Supremes ruled correctly; the definition of marriage is part of our State Constitution, and should not be overturned by some indirect implied assumption about a ruling an APPELLATE court made about a law in another state.
It was right and proper for SCOSC to put a hold on this while the legal issues were examined and clarified, and possibly until after the State seeks further legal redress.
I don't like the idea of changing the definition of marriage my left wing friend.