Actually Tom Clancy would be an independent organization free of governments that is well funded that hires former Soviet scientists to build nuclear weapons from fissile material stolen from FSU sites across Eastern Europe to blackmail governments into doing what they want or risk having nuclear weapons that have already been smuggled into their respective nations exploding in large population centers.
Seriously dude, you can't even that right.
Tom Clancy is for the most part a writer of FICTION and I'm not a fan so keep your weird obsession to yourself. Re-read you bold type....LOL
So you are literally saying that Obama should have said no to the demands of people for freedom?
So you are literally saying that Obama should have actively helped dictators put down revolutions asking for the same freedoms that Americans enjoy?
So you are literally saying that Obama should have turned his back on people despite praising the democracy of the Iraqis?
Libya is still not Anti-American. Please get some basic knowledge about something before replying. Your ignorance here is astounding.
Drama is not a substitute for knowledge.
Yes, ours is not a perfect world where Democracy tames a society still wrapped up in a 7th Century religion who are hell bent on destroying the Zionist. It's been the policy for decades but hey, Obama's in and he wants to try something new.
Your naivete seems to know no bounds also. FREEDOM ? How pathetic. Morsi and the Muslim Brother hood are ALL about "Freedom" I mean you believed Obama's nonsense when he associated freedom and Democracy with what actually occurred in Egypt and Libya ? Are you always this gullible ? And how can you be, especially after the Muslim Brotherhood taking over in Egypt, so sure Libya will stay Pro-American ?
Your a expert I realize but the Libyan Govt seems to be having some trouble with their terrorist population killing American Ambassadors......wait, do you still think that was a protest ? When they're over run with Islamic Fundamentalist you can politely say you had no idea what the hell you were talking about ok ?
This coming from the guy who is afraid of a 50 year old subsonic bomber over the actual threats the Russians pose. You really have no idea do you?
Afraid ? I simply posted the fact to show you were full of ****. Those bombers managed to make it to the Island of Guam " hope it don't tip over Mr Johnson " with well over 800 kilotons of nuclear war heads strapped to their wings. Guam is high on the list of islands that are of strategic importance to the united states. But you already knew that.....no, no you didn't.
Also with my 43 years of age, a chronic and obsessive reading habit, a near 140 IQ and the innate ability to snuff out bull **** form posters like you there is very little I have "NO IDEA" about, your proclamations not withstanding.
If that is actually what they want, why didn't they just use their massive chemical weapon stockpiles during the previous wars? And of course, Fenton will have no answer to that. Iran's stockpiles of chemical weapons would be well more than necessary to wipe out Israel. Iran has had the power in the past to make good on its threats. It did not. Furthermore, there is no Islamic Decree against using chemical weapons of mass destruction. There is one against nuclear weapons.
It's chemical weapons stock pile ? Wow, you really are dense aren't you ? Iraq had chemical weapons too Cochise, and they tried to build a Nuclear reactor in the early 80's. Israel took it out. Why ? With your extensive self proclaimed knowledge of EVERYTHING can you possibly think of any reason Iran would wan't a Nuclear weapon ? Your Islamic decree ? You can take that and 5 bucks and get a coffee at Starbucks....
It's actually quite funny. That a theocracy hell bent on the destruction of the Zionist state would first build a bomb...because that's what Iran is doing....and then decree that it's use is a violation of their charter. Lol......
And people like you vote..
I guess it's wrong to promote Democracy in the Middle East.
I guess it's wrong to promote the freedoms America enjoys and then actually help people get them.
I guess it's wrong to give people the chance at self rule.
Your'e either exposing more of your seemingly never ending supply of naivete or your being dis-indigenous. Either way this part of your post is " Exibit A " in the case AGAINS democracy. The fact that someone with your supposed "Middle Eastern and Terrorist Expertise" could make 3 statements, each more void in reason than the last.
Yes, it's wrong to initiate "Democracy' in a Country that had a Zionist hating Islamic group waiting in the wings for their chance to take over. And don't think for a minute Obama didn't know that the result of the Arab spring was the putting into power of historically violent groups who would eventually move away from "Democracy" and "freedom" and into a theocratic-dictatorship.
Things like running scenario's for the possibilities of enabling a huge power vacuum in a Country filled with Islamic Fundamentalist is usually the responsibility of our DOD.....But no, Obama gets to play the "act dumb card". To bad he's held up by countless useful idiots who think it's beyond his administration to expect the obvious.
It's funny that you equate what happened in Egypt to "Freedom". It's an over simplistic evaluation at best. It's also VERY simplistic to think you can force Democracy into a culture that has yet to egress from the 7th Century and expect " the freedoms America enjoys ". It's only Freedom to you because to call it what it is ( The Installment of a Zionist Hating Islamic Group ) counters your increasing erroneous statements.
Everyone knows that you are exaggerating to suit your hatred. Get over it.
Still funny you call me naive, yet you can't even explain the problem China and Japan have had over the islands.
Still funny you call me naive, yet you don't even realize that the real threats Russia can level at us don't include a 50 year old subsonic bomber.
Still funny you call me naive, yet you think that regimes who have spent decades never risking their necks would suddenly end their regimes for what amounts to effectively little
Fenton, you are done and it is obvious.
Who's everyone ? You and all of the other self proclaimed victors who can't stop themselves from posting excuses, inaccurate data from subjective web sites and paragraphs filed with make believe data ? And Russia's real threat ? Did I say that the bomber was their only means of causing massive destruction to American soil ? I brought up the possibility of them dumping their bonds in an earlier post.
Are taking credit for that ? And I'm not done, I'm just getting started. As long as there are goofy liberal posters attempting to push their lies and misinformation as legitimate data I'll be here. I wouldn't miss the coming paradigm shift for anything.
FYI: Don't even bother with your Russia comment, we both know you can't do it.
Also, it's pretty clear you do not have the skill or knowledge to actually address what I write. If you did, you would. But clearly you cannot.
The skill to address what you write ? This is a skill ? Wow
Actually your'e one of the easier posters here to slap down. You claim arbitrary victory for some of the most ridiculous comments and then make generic broad brush definitive statements. I think your'e probably about 19 years old, thoroughly immature and self-conscious.