- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
so by cases, you really mean the one case that is currently under review.
Can you ****ing read? I don't think you can. How many times did I say "all of them"? ALL. OF. THEM.
State AND Federal. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Yes, this exchange is QUITE pathetic, entirely by your doing.
and considering I said the issue at the federal level of what level of scrutiny must be met in regards to SSM has not been resolved.
No, you didn't:
the courts, and hence the law, have sided that we have a right to limit government programs.
the argument over if same sex marriage is protected based on gender is one that the courts might give consideration to.
but under what logic are polygamists going to claim they are a protected class?
You tried to backpedal to it later, but guess what? I'm still right, because the federal cases do exactly what I said.
You don't have a clue what you're talking about. It's no wonder you're having so much trouble following the very simple things I said.