- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
This link is also posted in the immigration forum, but that thread is intended for the immigration aspects. This thread and poll is intended for a different sub-topic that is contained within the story. I have also seen this sub-topic mentioned in other news stories as well, so it's not exactly a rare issue.
Should Constitutional rights extend to non-citizens?
Should something like the 1st Amendment right to free speech and expression apply to non-citizens (who are in this country)?
Should Constitutional rights extend to non-citizens?
The question isn't how things are done now. We may be doing them correct, or we may be doing them incorrect. The question is: What do YOU think should apply to non-citizens regarding specifically Constitutional rights and protections?Tattoo Checks Trip Up Visas - Yahoo! Finance
Quote from article: Some critics say U.S. officials are making decisions that derail people's lives and encroach on their rights. "They cast too wide a net and border dangerously on violating first amendment freedom of speech and expression," said Jeff Joseph, a Denver immigration lawyer.
Should something like the 1st Amendment right to free speech and expression apply to non-citizens (who are in this country)?
Last edited: