- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 100,834
- Reaction score
- 53,617
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Talk about distorting.......... the second graph is sun spot activity. First graph is solar output, and it has been going up steadily since 1950.
So much for your powers of perception and dispassionate evaluation of the facts. :roll:
You should take another look. The first graph is of solar proxies. The bottom half is in fact sunspots. The top half conveniently stops its long-term trend line around 1980. Exactly the same place that every other skeptic likes to cut it off.
Of course, Tex never listed his source so it's hard to dispute it directly.
What next? A new tax to limit water in the atmosphere? :lamo
No. That would be stupid. Mankind could spit all of the water it wants into the atmosphere with no long-term effect. Why? Water vapor has a saturation point. Go beyond this, and it comes back down almost immediately in the form of rain. Ozone depletion has negative impacts far greater than the minor temperature variation it might cause.
Well, the newest twist I've heard to "global warming" is that the mean temperature has dropped approximately 1/2 to 1 degree over the past 100 years. I believe that's why they changed it to "climate shift" instead of "global warming". Too easy to debunk the latter, but these eco-terrorists still have to get their point across.
These are the same guys who beat off vigorously to The Day After Tomorrow and yell "see, I told you it can happen".
This twist of yours is downright retarded because the temperature has definitely increased in that time period. Even hardcore skeptics don't actually say the earth is currently getting colder. Where did you hear this???
Last edited: