Oh my, BO peep's roll-out comes to an end, huh? And on one of his really special issues.
Scalia says.....No. You don't just deem fit what you think you can.
The majority decision, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, said the EPA has to consider the costs of complying with the rules and sent the air pollution regulations back to the agency. "EPA must consider cost — including cost of compliance — before deciding whether regulation is appropriate and necessary. It will be up to the agency to decide (as always, within the limits of reasonable interpretation) how to account for cost," Scalia wrote in agreeing with the industry.
The decision will have repercussions for other EPA regulations that are key to Obama's climate change agenda. The EPA will now have to examine the cost of compliance for the Clean Power Plan, which is at the heart of the president's environmental agenda.
The EPA had argued that the rules are both appropriate and necessary regardless of the costs,
and that it has the discretion under the law to act as it deems fit in regulating hazardous pollutants.....snip~
Supreme Court rules against EPA on pollution rules | WashingtonExaminer.com