- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 28,824
- Reaction score
- 20,497
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Isn't that the purpose of analyzing the Supreme Court decision? There are certainly indications in their decision that seem to indicate and even invite nationwide challenges....and unless the idealogy of the Supreme Court shifts over the next few years, it certainly is a clear sign of hope for an end to discrimination nation-wide.
I'm not opposed to sanctioning gay marriage, if the government has to be involved - it's only fair - however, I don't see how this ruling leads to your conclusion. If the court ruled that the state's definition of marriage cannot be abrogated by the federal government, how is it that the court would later rule that a state's definition of marriage can be abrogated by another state's definition?