- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Not an insult at all, just an observation. There is a difference. If you take it as an insult, that's probably more telling than you want to admit.You're quite uninformed opinion about me is both compliment and insult. But thanks for the compliment part I guess.
But what does it profit us to take a middle-of-the-road position between right and wrong? Between profitable and detrimental? Between reality and falseness? How is it extreme to want to elect a President with proven track record for success? When it is obvious that electing an unqualified Barack Obama has created far more problems for the country than anything good that has happened during his administration? When a Hillary Clinton has just as dismal a track record and absolutely no significant successes in anything to show on her resume? When an Elizabeth Warren is pretty much a carbon copy of he existing President in wanting to expand powers of government? When Joe Biden is Joe Biden?
Given his already impressive track record, which of these would be more likely to do a credible job in Washington than Scott Walker would likely do?
But how easy will it be for the Democrats and a left leaning media be to make him look unqualified or unsuitable because he doesn't have a college degree?
Anyway, I've also been on record in this thread that the whole lack of a degree thing is a non-issue, and have stated clearly that track record is much more relevant. College simply isn't for everybody. College is also zero guarantee that a person is competent and capable.