- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
OMG the irony meter has melted
Coming from you ill take that as a great compliment.
OMG the irony meter has melted
Well there head of the organization is this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZlJRrRgQIk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd73D44L6cMI was at the NRA convention-not that rally in the evening. Where do you get off calling people who were there "wacko idiots"
Support of torture.and why are you so upset about Palin bashing terrorists?
Well there head of the organization is this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZlJRrRgQIk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd73D44L6cM
Support of torture.
Well there head of the organization is this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZlJRrRgQIk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd73D44L6cM
Support of torture.
I am familiar with WLaP. the more people like you squawk about him, the more I believe he is doing a good job as head of the NRA. its funny that a group that protects law abiding gun owners causes so much garment soiling, bed wetting and downright fear and trembling by the loony left
why are you so hot and bothered about terrorists getting subjected to harsh interrogation techniques?
1.)It doesnt work. There is a broad consensus it doesnt work
2.)Its illegal
3.)It makes us no better than the terrorists who torture
4.)Paints our country in a negative light
5.)Why would a supposed "good family Christian" compare baptism and torture in the same light? Isnt baptism holy?
Well we helped make it illegal. Ever heard of the United Nations Convention against Torture?who made it illegal
Does that make it rightful to use?and who is going to prosecute the USA
Not according to John McCain, the Army Field Training Manuel, and many neuroscience studies, and various other ex CIA and FBI interrogators.and it does work in some cases
Well we helped make it illegal. Ever heard of the United Nations Convention against Torture?
Does that make it rightful to use?
Not according to John McCain, the Army Field Training Manuel, and many neuroscience studies, and various other ex CIA and FBI interrogators.
and it does work in some cases
well apparently some of the information needed to kill OBL came from water boarding
WASHINGTON (AP) — A U.S. Senate investigation concludes waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods provided no key evidence in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, according to congressional aides and outside experts familiar with a still-secret, 6,200-page report. The finding could deepen the worst rift in years between lawmakers and the CIA.
...
The most high-profile detainee linked to the bin Laden investigation was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused Sept. 11 mastermind who was waterboarded 183 times. Mohammed, intelligence officials have noted, confirmed after his 2003 capture that he knew an important al-Qaeda courier with the nom de guerre Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti.
The Senate report concludes such information wasn't critical, according to the aides. Mohammed only discussed al-Kuwaiti months after being waterboarded, while he was under standard interrogation, they said. And Mohammed neither acknowledged al-Kuwaiti's significance nor provided interrogators with the courier's real name.
well apparently some of the information needed to kill OBL came from water boarding
Where did you get that information from? Torture works just fine, that is why it is used. The problem you run in to is that the person being tortured may tell his interrogators anything to get the torture to stop so you often get bad info. But you get the truth too.There is no evidence this is actually true.
The only thing torture works for is to suppress internal dissent. When some rabblerouser disappears for six weeks and comes back 30 pounds lighter and with bandages on all his fingertips, people get the message. It doesn't work for obtaining actionable intelligence.
There is no evidence this is actually true.
The only thing torture works for is to suppress internal dissent. When some rabblerouser disappears for six weeks and comes back 30 pounds lighter and with bandages on all his fingertips, people get the message. It doesn't work for obtaining actionable intelligence.
Where did you get that information from? Torture works just fine, that is why it is used. The problem you run in to is that the person being tortured may tell his interrogators anything to get the torture to stop so you often get bad info. But you get the truth too.
The problem with getting bad info along with possibly some good info is that it becomes impossible to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Torture for verifiable information works.
Torture for verifiable information works.
Sure, on your average episode of 24.
And according to Leon Panetta as well. CONFIRMED: CIA Chief Panetta Admits Info From Waterboarding Led US to Osama Bin Laden (Video) | The Gateway Pundit
Torture for verifiable information works.
And according to Leon Panetta as well. CONFIRMED: CIA Chief Panetta Admits Info From Waterboarding Led US to Osama Bin Laden (Video) | The Gateway Pundit
Thanks for your extensive list of links backing up your assertion. As we all know, supported positions trump impressions every time... and posts only based on impressions are merely lint in the Internet pipe.
Run along skippy.
Uh oh, Harvard debating school tactics! What next, holding your breath?