- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 3,671
- Reaction score
- 1,059
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No... What's amazing is you calling what Palin actually said in that interview "fatuous". She made a statement of absolute fact when discussing our relations with Russia, and there was nothing at fatuous about it.
well, obviously, we disagree.
and i have a certain degree of geography on my side.
the Bering Strait is 50 miles wide. Do you know how far one can see to the horizon? just under 3 miles. Of course, out there in the middle of the Strait are the two Diomedes Islands, one of which belongs to Russia, the other to the U.S. You can see Big D from Little D... of course, you can also see into yesterday (or tomorrow, depending on which Island you are chilling yer blains on) in as the IDL runs right between the two and THAT makes as much sense as saying you can see from Alaska to Russia.
still think you can see Russia from Alaska? well, of course, climb the Cascades and you might see the top of mountains in Russia. meaningful, innit?
but,,, the fact that you cannot actually see Russia from any populated place in the Continental U.S. is not what makes the statement fatuous - even if you COULD really see from Alaska to Russia... how in hell does that qualify m. Palin to the Vice Presidency? In what way does that identify her as a expert in U.S./Soviet affairs? If it did, it would make EVERY resident of Alaska such an expert.
on further consideration, "fatuous" is simply not strong enough a word - 'asinine' is far more le mot juste.
geo.