Amigo
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,945
- Reaction score
- 326
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I go for Santorum of course, but opinions can differ.
I'm registered as a Republican. I'm going to vote in the Republican primary, and I'm hoping to vote for the Republican nominee in the general election. I don't line up really well with the GOP on several issues, but right now I think they represent this country's only hope of a positive recovery from our current economic problems.
But if they nominate Santorum, I swear on the blood of my ancestors I'll vote to re-elect President Obama.
I wouldn't vote for either one, but given the choice of Santorum and getting stabbed in the face with a grapefruit spoon, I'd take the spoon every time.
What is wrong with Santorum?
In it, he said that liberalism and moral relativism in American society, particularly within seminaries, contributed to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal. He wrote, "...it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm.
I'll bet once he's the nominee, you'll end up voting for him!
BTW, a vote for Obama is a vote against America.
What is wrong with Santorum?
Hello, I'm Amigo's sister:
Alot of people said this about Reagon, yet he was one of the best, So, I hope and pray it's Santorum.
Hello, I'm Amigo's sister:
Alot of people said this about Reagon, yet he was one of the best, So, I hope and pray it's Santorum.
Well, except for him wanting to essentially establish a theocracy, legislate morality (screw the Constituion, eh?), and being as intelligent as a bag of hammers, he's great.
He's running on Conservative social stances and doesn't seem too bothered about the economy. With the current stance of the economy, we see where his priorities lie and, in my opinion, that's not anywhere close to where they should be.
He has great respect for the Constitution, I have no clue where you get all this false imformation.
He doesn't want to impose his moral views, he has said this time, after time. Stop trying to go against a champion of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
SANTORUM: Well, first, I was the first author of medical savings accounts back in 1992 with John Kasich in the House, but this is -- this is a very important argument here. This is the 10th Amendment run amok. Michele Bachmann says that she would go in and fight health care being imposed by states, mandatory health, but she wouldn't fight go in and fight marriage being imposed by the states, that would be OK.
We have Ron Paul saying, oh, what the states want to do -- whatever the states want to do under the 10th Amendment's fine. So if the states want to pass polygamy, that's fine. If the states want to impose sterilization, that's fine.
No, our country is based on moral laws, ladies and gentlemen. There are things the states can't do. Abraham Lincoln said the states do not have the right to do wrong.
I respect the 10th Amendment, but we are a nation that has values. We are a nation that was built on a moral enterprise, and states don't have the right to tramp over those because of the 10th Amendment.
Being a true Republican, but first a conservative, this is no contest. Santorum any day of the week over Obama.
Ames, Iowa August debate
Link
If a state does something he doesn't like morally, **** the 10th amendment and the Constitution, that state doesn't have the right to do it.
Santorum's morals don't give him the right to tramp over the Constitution.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Amigo I know how the electorate works in SC, and while Rick may seem like a decent choice to you he is indeed a giant idiot that refers to himself in the third person and thinks Obama is in bed with our enemies:
Santorum's morals don't give him the right to tramp over the Constitution.