Yeppers, Ron Paul is still a fool.
No fool like the old fool.
The libertarian principle to own property does not extend universally everywhere.
I don't see Ron Paul defending this right he says convicted child molesters must have to buy a house across the street from his victim's school and live in it.
But, if you're going to take Paul's silly theory of completely unrestricted property rights to heart, that's exactly what he means.
A man can't buy a half-acre corner lot in a residential neighborhood and build a totally nude strip club. Ain't gonna happen, and Paul wouldn't defend it.
Why are people limited from building willy nilly?
Because property is purchased and sold based on more than acreage. Neighborhood, zoning, and appropriateness of the construction to the community are all perfectly rational libertarian considerations of any project. Libertarians do not live in a vacuum.
It's completely inappropriate for terrorists to be allowed to build a temple to terrorism on Ground Zero. Period. No rational person argues it is. Rationalizing persons who want something else argue for this.
Just in case you're unfamiliar with the term, rationalizing is the process people go through to convince themselves that the third eclair won't show up in their thighs. It's a form of lying that bears a loose resemblance to "reasoning", but the purpose is deceit.
EDIT:
Don't forget,
Ron Paul is one of those silly people that actualy subscribe to the notion of Shared Blame. Is it any wonder that Paul wants to turn the discussion away from the victory tower the muslims are trying to build on Ground Zero?