Grendel
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 704
- Reaction score
- 298
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Oh I'm sure there were a lot of people who didn't like GWB (especially the second time around) who voted for him nevertheless because they disliked Kerry even more. You, however, are not one of those people. It is abundantly clear that you voted for him for other reasons.
Only 30% of Bush voters were voting against Kerry rather than for Bush CNN.com Election 2004
In retrospect, of course, they were all voting against Kerry, not for Bush. I bet if you look through the archives, you'll find rightwiners complaining that Democrats are all negative and are only voting against Bush because they can't find a candidate they like.
I asked you to point out the bad stuff that led to a Democrat takeover of Congress in the 2006 elections. Seems that liberals want to hold Bush totally accountable for 2008 and ignore the fact that he was in office through the Clinton recession, 9/11, and a strong economy and job creation from 2003-2006 yet lost the election in 2006. I want a liberal to explain it.
So basically Bush isn't responsible for anything that happened while he was President?