- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,657
- Reaction score
- 75,610
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I have already stated my case.
You don't agree - fine.
I doubt either of us is going to change the other's mind.
What is the point in going on and on about it?
I am done on this for now.
Good day.
I dont agree because I'm more looking at the interests of the business, etc. Not people that clearly act in very negative ways and will be possibly protected by the law but not other consequences (which they may deserve).
I dont think we're that far apart, but to me, the slippery slope..if it occured... would end up harming the league even more.....I think it's better for society when individuals/private parties are able to make individual decisions and choices rather being dictated to by law or policy. (As long as it is not discriminatory) Following guidelines and policies yes, dictated by? No. IMO the opposite slope leads to 'zero tolerance' policies which I am against.