- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 26,526
- Reaction score
- 9,462
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Ah my bad, misread that.
just trying to help
Ah my bad, misread that.
BLASPHEMER!!!! Chik-Fil-A's awesome!
The political positions of Chick-Fil-A are what put the stakes of the state in jeopardy. Try and keep up?
I laugh at that phrase to, its propaganda since that word is totally subjective
where does it state that???????????????????
Nebbia v. New York .--In upholding, by a vote of five-to-four, a depression-induced New York statute fixing prices at which fluid milk might be sold, the Court in 1934 finally shelved the concept of ''a business affected with a public interest.''149 Older decisions, insofar as they negatived a power to control prices in businesses found not ''to be clothed with a public use'' were now viewed as resting, ''finally, upon the basis that the requirements of due process were not met because the laws were found arbitrary in their operation and effect.
Development .--In Munn v. Illinois, 153 its initial holding concerning the applicability of the Fourteenth Amendment to governmental price fixing, 154 the Court not only asserted that governmental regulation of rates charged by public utilities and allied businesses was within the States' police power, but added that the determination of such rates by a legislature was conclusive and not subject to judicial review or revision. Expanding the range of per missible governmental fixing of prices, the Court in Nebbia 155 declared that prices established for business in general would invite judicial condemnation only if ''arbitrary, discriminatory, or demonstrably irrelevant to the policy the legislature is free to adopt.''
Yep, they make this homo very happy(the only "bad" food I allow myself to eat), and I find that better than to stop eating there all together.
making a mere declaration doesn't establish something as fact. Sorry, chief
14th amendment:
Regulation of Business Enterprises - Fourteenth Amendment U.S. Constitution - Findlaw
The 14th amendment gives the state the right to regulate businesses when the state's interests are in jeopardy.
14th amendment:
Regulation of Business Enterprises - Fourteenth Amendment U.S. Constitution - Findlaw
The 14th amendment gives the state the right to regulate businesses when the state's interests are in jeopardy.
This homo lol. I love your lack of political correctness when speaking of your homosexuality. Its a breath of fresh air. For what its worth, I still shop at Target, eat Oreos, and go to Disney World when I can.
So you want blacks in Chicago to be unemployed.
again, how would the states interest be in jepordy from the selling of chicken, or the political views espoused by these selling the chicken, and please cite any case supported by these ruling that attempts to limit a private individuals commercial activity, based on their political views.
Making the false argument that Chik-Fil-A's chicken frying is what is being debated here makes you look dishonest. That is a fact.
14th amendment:
Regulation of Business Enterprises - Fourteenth Amendment U.S. Constitution - Findlaw
The 14th amendment gives the state the right to regulate businesses when the state's interests are in jeopardy.
and you claim to HATE those who refuse to acknowledge their hypocrisy... :lamo
that made me laugh.
you compared price fixing and destroying communities with denying people for disagreeing with political views.
once again you failed,try again fascist.
Still creating straw man arguments? Kk.
still unable to justify your views and address relevant criticism? Again, explain how denying a business proper licensing, based on their political views, doesn't amount to the state infringing on their right to the free exercise of political speech
You still don't see where your argument is wrong? You asked where the state has a right to defend its interests. I showed you where. You can run along and try and change the constitution if you don't like it.
as long as those interests are in line with a group you agree with? right buddy?
You still don't see where your argument is wrong? You asked where the state has a right to defend its interests. I showed you where. You can run along and try and change the constitution if you don't like it.
as long as those interests are in line with a group you agree with? right buddy?
You still don't see where your argument is wrong? You asked where the state has a right to defend its interests. I showed you where. You can run along and try and change the constitution if you don't like it.
You don't get it yet do you? It has nothing to do with frying chicken. That you're still making it about that is silly. I can't help you if you can't really see that this has nothing to do about the fat in their fries.