- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 3,671
- Reaction score
- 1,059
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Natural to animals does not make it natural to humans.
humans ARE animals. what is natural to THIS animal is natural.
geo.
Natural to animals does not make it natural to humans.
don't forget monogamy....
now you are getting somewhere... maybe.it's morally taboo in the majority of the world.
'intrinsic: belonging to a thing by its very nature:There is a fundamental morality that is intrinsic.
ah, now... you are misrepresenting the facts and making logical errors.I'm saying it's wrong because a lot of people don't like. Because the majority of the major religions don't like it, and because historically....humans don't like it.
☺Overpopulation and Population Control: The Making of a Myth:
What does marriage have to do with procreation Tucker? It has no logical basis for what is unnatural about procreation. Married or not, heterosexuals will still produce children together, and share their DNA, homosexuals cannot do this. It is this that makes it unnatural. Come on, you of all people? You marriage straw man is not welcome..
Tim-
Further, there are many definitions of the word Natural that have nothing to do with nature.
really? would you like to point to one?
geo.
male homosexual sex, is dangerous! It's dangerous for ANYONE
State of being is a philosophical concept, CC, it holds no objective truth value, only subjective, or relative.
can you show this?
geo.
really? do we really have to point to all the medical studies that show male homosexual sex is dangerous and leads to more STDs...really???? unless, of course, you are discounting anal sex.
natural:. . . . .
really? do we really have to point to all the medical studies that show male homosexual sex is dangerous and leads to more STDs...really???? unless, of course, you are discounting anal sex.
really? do we really have to point to all the medical studies that show male homosexual sex is dangerous and leads to more STDs...really???? unless, of course, you are discounting anal sex.
Certain sexual acts carried heightened risks, but they are neither exclusive to homosexuals, nor a part of being homosexual. A gay man in a monogamous relationship is at less risk for STDs than a strait man engaging in promiscuous sex.
can you show this?
sorry, but that is about as wrong as it can be. 'state of being', 'what is'. has existential reality, is objectively qualifiable, is empirical and self instantiating. it holds a truth that is about as absolute as we can get. homosexuality is a part of the definition of human behavior because that is how humans behave. whether it is good or bad, desireable or undesireable is the only argument here and yours relies entirely on nonrational, subjective 'absolutes' - "i don't like it", "i was taught to not like it", "my god doesn't like it", "it's icky".... take yer pick.
you should go back to equivocating about its "moral" justification - in attempting to deligitimize it via scientific, medical/psychological or philosophical qualification, you are failing miserably.
geo.
Your talking about anal sex, which can be practiced by straight couples as well, and not all gay men practice in anal sex. It can't get anymore simple then that.
LOL.. Ummm.. No it doesn't, but that was an amusing aside all the same.. Thanks!
Tim-
Your talking about anal sex, which can be practiced by straight couples as well,
and not all gay men practice in anal sex. It can't get anymore simple then that.
+ Anal sex practiced among heterosexuals is also unnatural, and I beleive I made that point clear earlier on to avoid such nonesense
Certain sexual acts carried heightened risks, but they are neither exclusive to homosexuals, nor a part of being homosexual. A gay man in a monogamous relationship is at less risk for STDs than a strait man engaging in promiscuous sex.
yes, i am afraid it does. no matter what you want to think about the existence of something, its physical being qualifies it in all the ways i said.
lol
geo.
you have yet to qualfiy 'unnatural' as anything but a personal preference... again "I believe" does not make it true.
geo.
Penal, vaginal sex is exclusive to heterosexuals, and that's all that need be differentiated. You're squirming..
Tim-
What is a physical homosexual, sparky? careful geo..