ThePlayDrive
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2011
- Messages
- 19,610
- Reaction score
- 7,647
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I already articulated my "general logic" in my first post. Rights should only be restricted when a significant problem presents itself. Yelling "fire" in a theater is a significant problem - therefore, free speech should be limited in that sense. Psychos who don't need guns is also a problem, so IDs are a logical restriction Cyber-bullying is only a problem if it becomes harassment which is also a significant problem. Voter fraud - not a significant problem.I don't agree. You say that requireing ID to get a gun, a constitutional right, is a good thing because guns can kill. Would you apply the same logic to freedom of speech even though it can kill also?
Mass. High School Girl Commits Suicide after being Cyber-Bullied