- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,648
- Reaction score
- 1,245
- Location
- Western Pennsylvania
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Why the **** would Bush ever go to Europe?
That place is irrelevant.
That place is irrelevant.
Why the **** would Bush ever go to Europe?
That place is irrelevant.
Hahahaa - that what I thought. I've seen people here, people now denouncing the UN, use Iraq and Iran's refusal to comply with UN Resolutions/UN Umbrella groups as pretext for criticisms or war. Funny how those same people cry the irrelevance of the UN in matter of US affairs or Israeli affairs
That's a false analogy. Bush committed war crimes by ordering torture, not by accidentally killing civilians.For those of you who want Bush to be prosecuted for war crimes. What of Obama, should he be prosecuted for war crimes as well since he authorized the attacks on homes in Waziristan? Innocent children were killed. Im sure it is just the first of many actions taken by the United States under his tenure as Commander and Chief.
For those of you who want Bush to be prosecuted for war crimes. What of Obama, should he be prosecuted for war crimes as well since he authorized the attacks on homes in Waziristan? Innocent children were killed. Im sure it is just the first of many actions taken by the United States under his tenure as Commander and Chief.
Well, "if" the UN did that, Obama would turn him over. The world wants BushCo to pay for their crimes. It is inevitable.
They are irrelevant. You have a group that has member states that gun down their own populations in the streets and hang them from lamp posts and meat hooks trying to charge a US president with war crimes. They are just pissed because Bush did not knuckle under to them when he decided to invade Iraq. Right or wrong Bush made the decisions he thought were best for the US. In that very narrow thing I give him credit for having the balls to tell the UN to go stuff themselves. Many Americans were tired of the UN and their crap long before Bush came along.
Moe
That's a false analogy. Bush committed war crimes by ordering torture, not by accidentally killing civilians.
Wait so you think a sitting president would send out the federalis to arrest a former president on an international UN mandated warrant?
Are you freaking serious? :lol:
You don't even know what a war crime is.
I have supported Israel's right to bomb the **** out of any place that rockets aimed at them come from. War sucks. Palestinians elected Hamas into power and it's up to them to get rid of them. We got rid of the criminals running our country. Now, they need to do the same.
I would say the difference is that the war on OBL/al'Qaeda is justified while the war on Hussein/Iraq was not.I know what a war crime is. The point Im trying to make is that there are many calling for Bush to be brought up on war crimes charges for invading the sovereign nation of Iraq. There are governments asking the UN to bring Israel up on war crimes charges. Obama has authorized attacks that have resulted in the death of innocent children. I am simply asking, should he face war crimes charges for attacking a sovereign nation. There are many people who believe that the war on Iraq was a war crime in of itself. So how is that any different than what Obama has done?
You dont UNDERSTAND the UN.
Most Americans think the UN is a joke JUST because of the so called oil for food "scandal"..
But then again, they always refer to UN resolutions as the same time, about Iraq for example or when nations they want are sanctioned, the US is going through that whole process.
Ridiculous hypocrisy.
No actually I thought they were a joke back when they honored Idi Amin the cannible dictator of Uganda. I thought they were a Joke when they denied.
taiwan the right to be member of the UN. Do you know who was Ambassador to the UN when that happened?
George Bush senior. He assured the taiwanese that the US was behind them all the way even up to the point of escorting the Taiwanese delegation into the chamber for the voting and then sold them out. That was to appease the Chinese communist.
Moe
I would say the difference is that the war on OBL/al'Qaeda is justified while the war on Hussein/Iraq was not.
I know what a war crime is. The point Im trying to make is that there are many calling for Bush to be brought up on war crimes charges for invading the sovereign nation of Iraq.
Bush committed war crimes when he ordered and authorized torture.
Bush committed war crimes when he lied to the world his reasons for invading Iraq.
Obama has done none of these.
What's going on in Israel/Gaza is no comparison.
Bush committed war crimes when he ordered and authorized torture.
Bush committed war crimes when he lied to the world his reasons for invading Iraq.
Obama has done none of these.
What's going on in Israel/Gaza is no comparison.
If The Bush Administration Lied About WMD
Well, "if" the UN did that, Obama would turn him over. The world wants BushCo to pay for their crimes. It is inevitable.
IF? :roll:
Walmart must have been a bigger donor than Taiwan.
Ye, IF. Are you not aware that all of the intel pointed towards them having WMD's. Is it a lie if you truely believed that Hussein had them?