- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 5,120
- Location
- 0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
Here we have OC doing what he does so well... he puts words in other people's mouths and then argues from that point. And he'll argue you said it, and as witnessed above, he will call you stupid for a position he's assigned you. It's the only way the cretin seems to know how to debate... dishonestly.
Okay. Go and prove this. Try. And analyzing the logic behind the argument is not putting words in other's mouths. Merely because you have a historical problem with people dissecting your argument and showing how the logic is not only asinine but completely uneducated is not my problem. Furthermore, your constant failure to actually show how taking the logic within the argument of your opponent to its logical end is not dishonest. It's calling debating. The reason you are so often on the losing side of the debate is because you never learned how to debate in the first place. That is not my problem either. When someone shows how stupid the logic you used is, you fly off the hand rather then self reflect as to whether or not that logic was faulty in the first place. That is not a sign of maturity, nor a sign you are willing to grow as a person. I take it you don't take criticism well? Your constant inability to actually prove your argument much less how the concluded logic you declare "dishonest" is actually dishonest suggests you never were taught proper debate skills.
OC can't take the words at face value or ask what someone implied or their underlying meaning.
Let's see. The cost per job directly states it ends at the saved job alone. That explicitly argues that multipliers were not applied in the calculation. You will not have response to this because you cannot refute the logic I use. Hence why you always fall back on "he's dishonest!" Absolutely nothing I stated is what you make it out to be. If it was, you could show that the logic within the argument you posted taken to its conclusion is not what I argued. But you cannot. Nor will you even try.
Nope... he jumps right in a puts words in other people's mouths. It's a bad habit of his, that and his professional prevaricating while accusing others of it.
OC, it's time to clean up your pathetic act.
.
Good luck proving this. Especially after how I just dissected your tactic.
The simple fact that you call logic "putting words in other's mouths" is not a sign of skill on your part.