- Joined
- Dec 10, 2011
- Messages
- 457
- Reaction score
- 81
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I can't make the same reach you are about Nestle's CEO or Nestle as a company and their objectives. I'm trying to find a position I can agree with. If the water is being controlled and it requires payment, then in theory it can be shut off. Whether it is a government entity or a private company, the water is still off without payment. Are you advocating that all water should be free? Just some of it? None of it? I can't tell.
Where I live, we can have a well. I think that is the way it should be. Government run, at least it's done at or near cost and they work with you if you have trouble for a while. Business run, nobody would have a chance. The moment you can't pay, they shut you off. It's very dangerous. I can grow food if I need to supplement my ability to eat, but I can't get to the water if some company prevents me from having a well because it bought the water rights. Plus, the environmentalists and the elites in this world have said that the number of people the earth can sustain long term is only 500 billion. I don't like the implications of that.... especially if they own all water rights.