Woodrow Wilson would beat out FDR form a philosophical point of view. Wilson was a full blown unvarnished "screw the public" fascist. FDR was a "democratic-representive" varnished fascist. FDR went futher in part due to what Wilson began.
I love individuals such as yourself! They try to grasp reality, yet somehow fail to grasp that which is just in front of them! Okay, i gather your not a lazy-fairy tale supporter. What economic policy do you support? Please answer the question and dont spit out ignorant philosophies... The last part of your little rant holds no validility... Next time you have something worth reading please feel free to respond, until then please refrain from wasting other peoples times... Though when i say this, you have the freedom of speech, the only thing im against in this aspect is your ignorance of the subjects of which you speak.
See how libertarians become authoritarian when someone is not convinced of their sincerity. You say "please" this and "please" that, but what I really hear is "I demand you give me an answer that pleases me because it's all about me." People are not ignorant of how a Libertarian will respond when his selfish fantasy is threatened.
That is just stupid. There is a difference between owning yourself and someone owning you.
Ideological extremists, huh? I suppose Locke was pretty radical for his time. Even Jefferson admitted that the ownership of slaves was morally reprehensible. Plus, I didn't see you point anything out, you just yelled at some guy, and claimed victory. Whoop-dee-****ing-doo.
Yes, which is why I pointed him out several times throughout this thread.Jefferson? The guy who owned slaves and cried himself to sleep over it? The one who said that all men were created equal but kept hundreds as property without any rights - equal or otherwise?
Which makes you an idiot, since nowhere have I ever stated that we need to get rid government.And getting government out of our society is indeed an extremist agenda. And I am please to expose it at every opportunity.
Yes, which is why I pointed him out several times throughout this thread.
Which makes you an idiot, since nowhere have I ever stated that we need to get rid government.
And getting government out of our society is indeed an extremist agenda. And I am please to expose it at every opportunity.
Do you pretend that you are the sole libertarian putting forth views in this world? Do you believe that it is only your views and your beliefs and your agenda that is being considered when one talks about libertarians?
You must be pretending that you're presenting real arguments. ****-can the "omfg I'm teh angry" act, you aren't impressing anyone, and you aren't presenting anything except your own irrational hatred, borne of highly polarized partisanry.
Partisanry?!?!?!?!?!?! What am I being partisan about? For me to be partisan - there has to be a party worth a tinkers damn involved. Libertarians hardly qualfy. As a political party goes they are not even a pimple on the ass of the body politic.
You aren't disproving anything I've said at all since this is textbook partisanry in and of itself. Plus, I'm pretty sure Libertarian is a legitimate political party, since I registered as Libertarian on my voter registration card.
It depends on how you define libertarian, you have right and left libertarians, eitherway there is no objective way to measure it.