Re: Michael Dunn found guilty of 1st-degree murder in loud-music trial
Except for the FACT that it is a big deal.
Except that it really isn't. D'oh!
You choose to make it a big deal when it really isn't.
Nor was he under any obligation.
Given the circumstances, and what we know of, it is irrelevant.
Ask the jurors if they think it is relevant that he fled the scene and did not report and needed to be tracked down based on eyewitness information.
How many times in this thread does it need to be said?
No one knows
(that includes you, duh), or has yet provided any evidence as to why the Jury decided the way they did.
And as already said; If the Juror from the first trial is any indication, this has nothing to do with it, and has a lot to with Jurors not following the law, which is a miscarriage of Justice.
Only a person trying to evade prosecution would act in such a way.
Wrong. Only in someones cynical thoughts would they assume such.
And the jurors would be right to assume that.
Wrong again.
Jurors would be "allowed" to assume that. Not "right" for doing so.
Would you have left the scene and not immediately reported it to the police once you felt you were safe?
It depends. And that is what you seem not to be understanding. People act differently.
As was already pointed out. It was a traumatic experience, and he also had to deal with the basket case of a gf.
There was, and is nothing wrong in his intentions.
I'm not going to bother with posting anything else, because you won't see it anyway.
:doh
So you realize that he can not see what isn't there. Figures.
Inflaming the passions of others is fun? Because I see right through you.
Troll
Said the one engaging in exactly that behavior.
Figures. :doh
Excon just enjoys being a sphincter orifice (I'll let you decipher). The really scary part is that he might actually believe the tripe he posts here. Now that would really be scary.
Get a grip. This isn't about me or your incorrect and imaginative thoughts about me.
Try discussing the evidence.
No kidding. Talk about no evidence....
Then debate the actual evidence.
a dead guy is labeled a thug for playing loud music.
Stop being dishonest. No one here labeled him a thug for playing loud music.
His threats against Dunn's life and exhibited desire to carry through with his threats by getting out of the vehicle to carry through with those threats made him a thug. And that is what the evidence says. There was absolutely no reason to get out of the vehicle like his friend Leland testified to his doing. Yeah, he is a thug for acting like one.
There was no weapon (no evidence).
Wrong. There is evidence, as testified to.
One not being found later does not mean that there was none, especially given the circumstances and the suspicious activity of Davis's friends.
Now Davis's friends testified that he had his phone in his hand.
If the Police can be cleared for shooting a person because they were in fear for their life because they thought a phone in a persons hand was a gun, than so should Dunn.
Dead guy did nothing but play loud music AND piss of shooter.
Wrong.
The only evidence provided showed it was Davis who was pissed off. Not Dunn.
Shooter kills **innocent** man, and that's a fact...but he's **innocent** and the other guy is a thug. :doh
Shooter did not kill an **innocent** person. That person was the one who was pissed and started threatening Dunn's life. Dunn's reaction was out of fear.
And here are some choice excerpts:
"It's spooky how racist everyone is up here and how biased toward blacks the courts are. This jail is full of blacks and they all act like thugs," he notes. He goes on to say "This may sound a bit radical but if more people would arm themselves and kill these **** idiots when they're threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior,"
What a racist maniac. Its clear that he doesnt like blacks and if given the opportunity would kill them all if he had the chance. This pretty much confirms he's a sociopathic racist who wanted to kill those kids because he didnt like them.
Clearly you do not know what the term racist means. And your confirmation
There is nothing racist in there.
You are seeing what you want to see, not what is there.
Nothing there suggest that he thinks his race is superior to that of others races. Nothing.
He speaks to the fact that the jail is full of blacks
(Do you doubt that it was?), and goes on to speak to their
actions as being thugs. Do you really doubt that those in a jail
(a known criminal element of society) aren't acting like thugs? That is not speaking to all blacks, is it? Of course it isn't.
He speaks to such as idiots and killing them when they threaten you. That is not speaking to all blacks, is it? Of course it isn't, as it speaks specifically to the idiots who threaten you.
Not once did he indicate that his race was better.
I am sure that like him, you also have no use for such black criminal thugs, which is not racism, but a prejudice against some folks for the way they act.