1.) No need, really?
2.)As I've already explained, an individual has every right to do whatever they wish with themselves and their own property....as long as they do not harm others or the property of others by doing so.
3.) You have a right to change your body if the option is available.
4.) However, I have a RIGHT TO KNOW this before entering into a relationship with you.
5.) This is especially true if your "uterus" originally belonged to someone else, meaning "our" children would actually be the product of MY sperm and whoever provided the genetic material in the egg cell (which would not be YOU).
6.) Why? Because otherwise you have deceived me into a sham marriage and false parenthood.
7.) I would only have gotten involved thinking you were a "true" female
8.), that we could have children, and that such children would share OUR characteristics. Then I find we have produced a baby which looks like it was switched at birth?
9.) I should have the legal right to an annulment of the marriage and repudiation of the child, absolving me of ALL financial and parental obligations.
Why you would not think this would "fly constitutionally" is beyond me. While the First Amendment gives one the right to express themselves freely, everyone is still legally accountable for that expression.
1.) yes no need for a "law"
2.) agreed
3.) agreed
4.) no you do not, there is no such right at all LMAO
5.) again this has not impact and there is no right. Disagree, name the right there is none
6.) it wouldnt be a sham marriage at all by law, it would be 100% legal but you would be free to get a divorce
7.) Thats your choice but its not a right. Many people would only get involved if thier mates had good credit, perfect health, no history of drug use, never cheated in ther past, only had sex with one or a couple people, were always a certain religion etc etc etc but again NOT a right
8.) this to is just somethign you "want" but its not a right and many children do not share obvious characteristics of thier parents right now. again not a right.
9.) again this is your OPINION and a divorce or annulment can already be done without additional laws.
10.) Its not what I think its just a fact. As you stated in your OP about the law you think that should be in place you have no right to force anybody to disclose thier past to you or thier medical history . . none . . zero . . ziltch:shrug: If thats beyond you that for you to work on.
Like I said divorces and annulments can already be achieved for many reason, not law is needed on this issue and one in the manner you stated would not pass constitutional muster.
I understand your "concern" and your personal subjective issues with the matter but they do not translate into rights.