- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No, that's not what's going on here CC. You asked me of I though heterosexuality was a learned behavior. What I said was I think it could be and if it were, these are the things that would probably affect it.
Hmmm... doesn't seem that way. But if heterosexuality could be a learned behavior for several reasons, those reasons would have the same impact on homosexuality. You still haven't shown a distinction, with the exception of procreation... which is a completely separate issue and does not apply, and anatomy, which is related to a sexual act, not the orientation... and therefore does not apply.
. Listen, most discussions of sexual intercourse from a clinical perspective, outside the homo/hetero context will tell you this. Why does it not apply in this context?
Because you use the word "design" as an absolute. I am challenging you on the absolute.
The biological component is procreation+anatomy.
And I have already demonstrated how neither of these things apply.
I didn't say it is exclusive to homosexuals. What I said was that is was dangerous, and it seems less natural as a primary method of sexual activity than vaginal intercourse. To me That could be a reason to lean toward heterosexuality.
mac... again, we are talking about behavior, behavior that can be done by anyone in any context. You cannot make a direct correlation, here, which is why this part of your argument doesn't apply.
I don't think you do understand, to be honest, but thank you for being gracious.
No, I'm pretty sure I do. I've read nearly every post you've made on this topic in this and the other thread. When you discuss that your objections to homosexuality are moral/religious, I have no argument with you. In fact, I have a lot of respect for you saying that. But when you attempt to present that or other aspects of the argument in a logical sense, though I understand what you are doing, not only do I disagee, but I can demonstrate how/why you are wrong. If I were you, I'd stick to the moral/religious position.