alexa
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 4,684
- Reaction score
- 1,340
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Alexa,
The situation will need to be investigated. All evidence will need to be examined.
Under 48(b), all that would be required is for Israel to be able to demonstrate that the ship's crew resisted the inspection. Medical records relating to the soldiers' injuries should help provide sufficient evidence. The International Red Cross can potentially assist on that front. When the individuals responsible for the violence are prosecuted, as they should be, additional information could be revealed.
What was found on the ship could address 48(a).
But only one of those conditions need to be satisfied.
In the meantime, a measure of patience will be required. One cannot immediately know all the facts.
Your sincerity is never in any doubt with me. I have misgivings. My misgivings come from the time when soldiers complained about how things that happened in the 2009 Gaza war and they were discredited and other such things.
In addition because the law on whether they could board or not seems to be very questionable, it will be Israel deciding.
Also Israel took over the ship.......I am sorry but for me unless there is really proof, I will take the inquiry with a pinch of salt.
If there is proof, then it will be different.
But hey, I am always like that. People are always innocent with me till proven guilty. One I can remember was a school caretaker arrested for the murder of two young girls here. He was not guilty to me but as the trial went on he definitely became guilty to me, as indeed he was.
Last edited: