- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
- Messages
- 26,657
- Reaction score
- 15,930
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You'd need a consenting adult. That's not me.
Because you are not yet adult?
You'd need a consenting adult. That's not me.
Because you are not yet adult?
This is significant because children of gay parents
are 10 times (30%) as likely to be gay as the general population (3%)(Cameron, 1997, 8
and 9 of 14).
Wow...well, thanks Dave...but the above would have sufficed. I was just curious who "Cameron" was or is. But now that we're here. That's a pretty drastic claim by Cameron, wouldn't you say? I guess I'll be forced to look over his/her study to understand how these statistics came into being.
I don't believe it's a "choice" in the notion that one can go "I Choose to be homosexual" or "I choose to be straight". I do believe it can manifest itself in a person in ways other than pure genetics, ie that environmental factors can also help to usher in the feelings of attraction
Wow...well, thanks Dave...but the above would have sufficed. I was just curious who "Cameron" was or is. But now that we're here. That's a pretty drastic claim by Cameron, wouldn't you say? I guess I'll be forced to look over his/her study to understand how these statistics came into being.
1. It seems, through your example, you are (purposefully or no) leading to the conclusion that there is a drive of some sort that acts on this boy. When I hear homosexuals talk about an internal drive, it seems similar to this. But I don't believe in an internal drive. One reason being that I have not seen research that proves its existence conclusively. And another reason being that I believe arousal is possible if attention is exercised and stress, fear, anxiety extinguished and social programming overcome.
2. You've accounted for the novelty of similarity and I would have proposed that if you hadn't. How about the novelty of dissimilarity the boy feels towards the girls? They are strange and alien to him. On his own, he is too afraid or awed to perform with them. But the presence of the other boy makes him feel safe so he can enjoy the ministrations of the girl(s). This is something that can be strengthened so that the other boy is no longer needed as a crutch.
3. But if you are saying that the boy fixates -as in fantasizes- about the other boy while the girls are touching him, and that is how he is able to perform...... I can't accept that at face value. What is the reason the girl can not provoke pleasure? Saying the boy simply has homosexual proclivities is circular and I can't accept it. I'll think about this some more.
I had written that research paper about ten years ago and thought you might appreciate all the information because I feel it is thorough. I'm not anti-homo and the paper was not written with any bias. I seriously researched the subject for my own elucidation and satisfaction. I would admit a pre-disposition to the assumption that gay is not genetic but allowed the data to reveal itself. That was the question that needed answering.
I don't think it is drastic. I have several friends who have gay male children. I asked them (the fathers) what caused it. Both fathers said that they thought their boys had been molested by homo friends of their own when they were very young. Homos have more homo friends and acquaintances than straights, ergo the possibility of homo molestation is much greater. That would be my best thoughts as relate to the possibilities.
I had written that research paper about ten years ago and thought you might appreciate all the information because I feel it is thorough. I'm not anti-homo and the paper was not written with any bias. I seriously researched the subject for my own elucidation and satisfaction. I would admit a pre-disposition to the assumption that gay is not genetic but allowed the data to reveal itself. That was the question that needed answering.
I don't need to taste a dog turd to know I won't like it. .
Your religious bias is showing .....
It is a choice as sin always is. We have free choice to not sin.
Brother David..."Sin" is such an abstract word/term. But then again, you do know that...really you do.
funny part is homosexuality isnt a sign even by his religion
That's where you are wrong.
funny part is homosexuality isn't a sin even by his religion
OJ...I think David just chimed in with a reply to you post...which was an expected reply.
So it's not a choice, then. If it were a choice, you could simply choose to like it.
Heaven only knows, there is a plentiful supply of the stuff. At least in my back yard there is.
nope im 100% right
please explain how homosexuality is a sin