I never said anything of the sort.
There's nothing inherently 'wrong' with prejudice; I reject the self-evidence of the 'equality of man'. But I find Christianity anathema for precisely the same reason that the Christian finds liberalism abhorrent - its claim to universalism; its rejection of the distinct, of the peculiar.
The belief that "salvation belongs, first to the Jew, then to the gentile" is the most destructive doctrine imaginable. A faith is either grounded I'm a people, in their cultural essence, or it works against them, eradicating those distinctions which make them unique.
My aim is the recreation in American life of the aristocratic consciousness. This is intended as a palliative for three centuries of Christian-coerced democratic decline. I believe that hierarchy - real hierarchy, not an illusory Randian hypercapitalist market hierarchy - is innately valuable: and I in no sense imagine that I would be at the top, or anywhere close to it.
The social conservative, who hates the liberal 'elite', is a symptom of the populist disease. Every other form of American 'traditionalism', from the Southern slaveocracy of the nineteenth century to the neoliberal 'meritocracy' of today, has made a mockery of genuine distinction of rank, taking as their respective measures an arbitrary racial caste system or fiduciary gain. These too are products of democracy, and as such are inherently tainted. (The landed gentry of the antebellum South is almost precisely the opposite of what I have in mind.)