Tazmanian Devil
Banned
- Joined
- May 28, 2015
- Messages
- 972
- Reaction score
- 183
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Do you have bad eyes, why the large font?
You answered your own question.
Bravo.
Do you have bad eyes, why the large font?
Muslims who engage in jihad can find the legitimacy to do so in the Quran. Christians who engage in any violence are betraying Christianity”s teachings and can find no legitimacy to do what they do in the New Testament.
The Fictional Mohammed - Political Islam
Muslims who engage in jihad can find the legitimacy to do so in the Quran. Christians who engage in any violence are betraying Christianity”s teachings and can find no legitimacy to do what they do in the New Testament.
The Fictional Mohammed - Political Islam
Neither were the Islamic Terrorists killing in the name of JC. And that roves what?
What about the RWF attacks?
Oh yes they can.
Anyone can twist a religions text(s).
Then tell us why so few Christians do it that you know all their names from memory?
And then try to explain why the numbers of Muslim terrorist attacks since 9/11/01 is 26,114.
Numbers from a site that demonizes all Muslims. Right.
To you there is no such thing as a Muslim loyal to the country they were born in or immigrated to - I am referring to NA and the EU.
Munafiqs can be reactivated in jihad
One of the surprising things about Islam is how non-practicing Muslims often return to active service in jihad. Sometimes it only takes a personal contact or a rousing sermon to turn a non-practicing, ‘moderate’ Muslim into a jihadist. This is similar to the recruitment of young pacifists in time of war. The Tsarnaev brothers were nice, ‘moderate’ Muslims and then they became religious jihadists.
Boston Munafiqs
How did ‘munafiqs’ behave during the Boston Marathon Bombings? When Djokhar Tsarnaev was about to be arrested, he called his non-practicing, ‘secular’ Muslim friends to dispose of incriminating evidence in his dorm room. They eagerly complied. When members of the Tsarnaevs’ mosque were asked about the two brothers, they kept silent about what they knew. When recruited, the munafiqs acted on the side of jihad.
Numbers from a site that demonizes all Muslims. Right.
To you there is no such thing as a Muslim loyal to the country they were born in or immigrated to - I am referring to NA and the EU.
I do not give a hoot about a persons religionLook, if you REALLY wanted to convince us of your solidarity with Westerners you would be more truthful with us about Islam.
Aware as well as some nasty things in the OTYou would tell us what the Koran says about how Kafirs should be treated.
You really believe your own tripe?You should reveal what you know about the plans to conquer America and the world and etc.
Yes your mind has drifted into a conspiracy theorist reality. Quite the trip.Get my drift?
It really hurts your cause for us to find the truth on our own and realize you were either lying to us all along or you were content to say nothing while we would be led to the (figurative or literal) slaughter!
Depends upon what you are referring to now don't it.You can't be trusted.
I see you stutter while typing. Try singing when typing, I heard it can work. Well it did for a country singer. Who knows.And everything you do to deny, deny , deny, conceal, cover up, spin the truth into a half lie and attack anyone who tries to tell the truth or spread the truth only tightens the figurative nooses around your own necks.
I'm not going to waste my time debunking a crank who has absolutely no education in the field, and makes a profit off of fear-mongering. But thanks for the invitation.Gee, then it shouldn't be at all difficult for you to discredit his quotations from the Koran....
So, Taz, based on the content of your posts, the only logical conclusion is that either the Muslims are going to take over the world, or we need to start an all out war against all of Islam.
Interesting position, I must say.
lolMuslims who engage in jihad can find the legitimacy to do so in the Quran. Christians who engage in any violence are betraying Christianity”s teachings and can find no legitimacy to do what they do in the New Testament.
lol
Ah yes, the good ol' No True Scotsman fallacy. The only "True" Muslims are the ones who attack Christians, and the only "True" Christians are the ones who did not interpret Bible passages to justify centuries of violence and warfare. We should ignore the hundreds of millions of moderate Muslims who want to live in peace, and the Christians who want to bomb any nation that does not bend to our will back to the Stone Age.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the historical fact is that people justified centuries of warfare, violence, invasions, slavery, forced conversions and oppression based on the New Testament, pronouncements of Christian institutions, and declarations of leading Christian leaders. This is not to say that Christianity is exclusively negative, only that exculpating Christianity and Christians from their legacy of violence is utterly ridiculous.
Again... lolYou will, no doubt, be interested in seeing a graphic illustration of how Islam spread due to violent Jihad.
Thankfully, it only takes a few minutes to spit out the poison.I will give everyone time to absorb and digest the information I have posted here.
I have been infracted for posting more than three paragraphs from texts which permit full copying without edits. However, I will abide by the DP rules.
Three paragraphs. (Check the source) However, for readability's sake I will format them into more than three DP paragraphs.
An Ethical Basis for War
Aug 8 2007 | by Bill Warner
11
by Bill Warner
KNOW THE ENEMY
This work is based upon Sun Tsu’s The Art of War a 2,500 year old Chinese book of strategy.
THE ENEMY The word islam means submission . “ Submission” is a political thought. Islam claims that all who do not submit are unbelievers (kafirs). It is time to reject being named by Islam. We are not “unbelievers.” Muslims are the slaves of Allah. We are not the slaves of Allah. We do not submit. We are the Free . Instead of Muslims and nonbelievers, it is Muslims and the Free. Muslims, therefore, are the un-Free. [If you don’t know a word, look it up on the last page.] The story of Islam starts with the Jews since Islam is a Jewish heresy. The Koran endlessly adapts Jewish stories such as those of Moses and Noah to show that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah.
The Ten Commandments is a good place to start looking at Islam. They fall into two categories—religious and ethical. Ten Commandments—Religious
Do not have any other gods before Me.
Do not make an image or any likeness of Me.
Do not swear falsely by the name of the Lord.
Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy. Ten Commandments—Ethical
Honor your father and your mother.
Do not murder.
Do not commit adultery.
Do not steal.
Do not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Do not covet your neighbor’s property.
The only religion that follows all the religious commandments is that of the Jews. Christians do not follow the Sabbath commandment and some would argue that the Catholics and Orthodox sects use images that violate the image commandment. Hindus, Buddhists and atheists don’t follow any of the religious commandments. There are no two religions that agree on the Ten Commandments.
An Ethical Basis for War - Political Islam
Just skipping the vague nature of the phrase "truth about Islam," the War in Iraq was not a question of religion. It was a question of possession of WMDs, and given that Iraq did not possess WMDs, invading was clearly the wrong decision in hindsight.
There was no reason to invade.
A more accurate assessment is: You've set up a double standard, AND you tilt the scales even further by misrepresenting Islam.You see, I am not trying to whitewash Christianity as much as I am trying to keep Muslim apologists from using it to hide behind.
Christians also use violent and non-violent methods to "conquer the world."Jihadists are using VIOLENT JIHAD AND NON VIOLENT JIHAD to conquer the world and they are currently targeting the USA as well as other territories and peoples (hypocritical Muslims and non believers, i.e., Atheists, Christians, Jews and anyone else who isn't Muslim or Muslim enough) around the world.
Please.And to prevent Jihad from succeeding in the USA it is important that Kafirs (non Muslims) be made aware of the facts about Islam which Muslim apologists would rather be kept secret.
Or, your posts are unjustifiably spreading fear, and slandering hundreds of millions of peaceful people.Every criticism of my posts is evidence of how much they would rather keep us all in the dark, as we have been pretty much until recently.
On the contrary. We're just giving you plenty of rope.The best thing they could do would be to simply not respond at all.
Absolutely, there was never a reason to invade the sovereign nation of Iraq. Invading Iraq was one of the gravest mistakes of the GWB/Dick Cheney regime. We are reaping the consequences as we speak. Saddam Hussein, even though a dictator, had a system that worked. The structure he had in place kept the ethnic factions, Shia, Sunni and Kurds, from warring upon each other. Now with that structure gone, Iraq is broken, there is open war, and there is an opening for Iran to enter. The US broke Iraq and it's incumbent among the US and Britain to stabilize that country for the people there. The poll asks the wrong question.
Just skipping the vague nature of the phrase "truth about Islam," the War in Iraq was not a question of religion. It was a question of possession of WMDs, and given that Iraq did not possess WMDs, invading was clearly the wrong decision in hindsight.
The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world."
Absolutely, there was never a reason to invade the sovereign nation of Iraq. Invading Iraq was one of the gravest mistakes of the GWB/Dick Cheney regime. We are reaping the consequences as we speak. Saddam Hussein, even though a dictator, had a system that worked. The structure he had in place kept the ethnic factions, Shia, Sunni and Kurds, from warring upon each other. Now with that structure gone, Iraq is broken, there is open war, and there is an opening for Iran to enter. The US broke Iraq and it's incumbent among the US and Britain to stabilize that country for the people there. The poll asks the wrong question.