- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 16,875
- Reaction score
- 7,666
- Location
- St. Petersburg
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
What would you vote?
A) Projectile vomiting
B) Explosive diarrhea
C) None of the above
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm ...
Bernie for me.
He's about the only honest & principled guy that had a shot!
What would you vote?
Having no one at all would be better than the bitch in the pantsuit.
What would you vote?
Using your logic, DJT is best. People have to come to terms with the GOP candidate. Or come out of the closet and admit they are voting for corruption, Crooked Hillary.
i think that we should have that choice. if the none of the above option wins, they should have to toss the candidates and start over.
While in theory that sounds like a good thing, in practice it just doesn't work. Who gets to be in power while we're throwing away tons of candidates and starting over? Maybe whoever is currently in power will use that power to keep having bad candidates put up so they never have to leave office.
i doubt that it would be the winning option very often. voters love their little tribal political parties too much. this is probably the only election in recent memory in which it could actually happen.
I think it would happen in virtually every election. People only vote because they have no other choice and they don't want the other guy to win. Given a choice of keeping all of these political scumbags out of office, I think most people would take that option more often than not. I can't remember the last politician in any race that I have actually supported. It may never have happened in my entire life.
Between the two of them, yes. That doesn't mean that either of them are a particularly good choice, he's just the least bad of the two.
Since it'll never happen, we'll never find out, will we?