Justice For All
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2012
- Messages
- 192
- Reaction score
- 113
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I doubt anyone would be sitting on a couch when violent revolution happens in the United States.
I doubt anyone would be sitting on a couch when violent revolution happens in the United States.
Agreed. I think sides would be chosen and things would run their course. Hopefully this will never be a problem obviously.I doubt anyone would be sitting on a couch when violent revolution happens in the United States.
They'd be in the nearest shelter they can find.
Agreed. I think sides would be chosen and things would run their course. Hopefully this will never be a problem obviously.
I have two questions molten_dragon;I try any legal means available to me to get the ban repealed, but that would be the end of it. I don't care enough about the matter to rebel against the government over it.
Yeah, my thinking is politicians collectively would have to have a psychotic level of arrogance to even consider it as a possible political move. Then They would have to find an enforcement mechanism because I'm certain they would get a lot of badges turned in due to the officials not wanting to get shot dead for someone else's **** up.It would be a stupid move either way. If the government ever tried to ban the right to bear arms, they'd have to somehow enforce such a ban. That's going to be when the **** hits the fan. I frankly don't see it happening.
Yeah, my thinking is politicians collectively would have to have a psychotic level of arrogance to even consider it as a possible political move. Then They would have to find an enforcement mechanism because I'm certain they would get a lot of badges turned in due to the officials not wanting to get shot dead for someone else's **** up.
True, this is why I fight so hard here and hope others will as well. One mass shooting in Australia was all it took, I don't want that here.IF the British and Australians have taught us anything is that politicians who wish to disarm the populace will use a tragedy involving a firearm to try to ban and or severely restrict firearms after decades of severe anti-gun laws that have gradually disarmed a lot of people and made those who never fired a firearm scared of firearms and very willing to accept a ban. Baby steps.
No, I am talking about using firearms to overcome a tyrannical government that rapes and pillages its own citizenry. And I think you already know that so I wonder how you could possibly utter such a question honestly?
Unless I'm mistaken the crime would be treason rather than tyranny, because a politician would have to violate the constitution, betray their nation and usurp the rights of the people in order to enter into tyranny.
Capital Punishment would definately be an effective deterrent, providing said politician wasn't suicidal or stark raving mad.
All in favor say aye___AYE! :minigavel
History has shown us that the least tolerant of dissention are by far the communists.
100 million murdered in the name of equality and social justice__And this was after the revolutions.
IF the British and Australians have taught us anything is that politicians who wish to disarm the populace will use a tragedy involving a firearm to try to ban and or severely restrict firearms after decades of severe anti-gun laws that have gradually disarmed a lot of people and made those who never fired a firearm scared of firearms and very willing to accept a ban. Baby steps.
Where exactly did you make the jump to rape and pillaging of citizens from a disagreement about the meaning of language?
Agreed. I think sides would be chosen and things would run their course. Hopefully this will never be a problem obviously.
It's possible, one thing they would have to consider though is we might take a break from killing each other to royally **** up foreign invaders, then go back to killing each other. We're a nation of multi-taskers after all.Something else to think about is the bigger picture. If the United States clashed in civil war again, other countries around the world might take advantage of this.
That's what I said Turtle except you substituted "crap on" for "violate".engaging in tyranny would require a politician to crap on the constitution.
That's what I said Turtle except you substituted "crap on" for "violate".
If the second ammendment were banned I would wait for enforcment. When they come to my home to take my firearms I will most likely be killed. I am not giving them up. Give me liberty or give me death!
Everyone always speaks big on this issue but they have been restricting it when they have no authority to do so for decades and which one of them did anything about it? A big fat none. I can't just say I will revolt because no one will ****ing join me! It will be a party of one getting shot in the street.
Uh-huh, I think I'll pass on the holster__That is so not me, thank-you.There's this little thing you can buy called a holster...
__Cool 'Dude'!Great, I will count you as an ally on this issue