What "anti-poor" campaign?
There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.
You've got a point.
What "anti-poor" campaign?
Some people are obvious to the campaign situation.
Some people are obvious to the campaign situation.
More educated people tend to be more liberal that's a fact I can look it up if you guys insist otherwise too lazy.
I'm curious to know how those lower-class Republican values voters will react to this.
View attachment 67134642
Hell, I'm nominally sympathetic to the idea that there are too many people on the welfare rolls.
And yet it's patently obvious that Romney is nothing but a callous prick.
How much sympathy did Obama and his minions have for all the working class and poor people that were harmed by the drilling ban?
I'm curious to know how those lower-class Republican values voters will react to this.
View attachment 67134642
There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.
He wasn't referring to Republican voters, quite specifically.
I'm curious to know how those lower-class Republican values voters will react to this.
View attachment 67134642
say, can you tell me what the federal spending in all those states in your chart is comprised of?... that'd be great if you could.
( to be fair, you'll be the first person ever to do so in the 10 years i've been asking.. so i don't really expect you to substantiate them)
Then what distinguishes those Southern white Republicans on entitlements from the Democrats on entitlements?
Will the Republicans who rely on those entitlements appreciate Romney's sentiment?
Even if it weren't a completely facetious and snarky thread, making a juvenile point, that point defeats itself.
You even quoted what he said:
He wasn't referring to Republican voters, quite specifically.
It breaks down to about 35% military, 20% highways and public works, and 55% Federal entitlements.
Then what distinguishes those Southern white Republicans on entitlements from the Democrats on entitlements?
Will the Republicans who rely on those entitlements appreciate Romney's sentiment?
link ?.....
You are right, but he was mainly referring to low-income voters, which in both parties are many (poor in the city=dem, poor in a town=rep), he characterized them as teat-suckers.
You are right, but he was mainly referring to low-income voters, which in both parties are many (poor in the city=dem, poor in a town=rep), he characterized them as teat-suckers.
In terms of what Romney said, the fact that he wasn't referring to them. Strangely enough, I already said that.
It almost certainly will not matter to them, much as you'd like it to.
Look, they try to slam this "class warfare" bull**** down Republican candidates' throats all the time, yet Republicans still vote for them. Imagine that! This is no different.
Well if those people actually voted on policy rather than party lets just say a landslide would be an understatement.